Can Hyper-Velocity Stars Illuminate the Structure of the Galactic Halo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
Precise measurements of hyper-velocity stars (HVS) like SDSS J090745.0+024507 can provide insights into the structure of the Galactic halo, particularly its triaxiality, which is predicted by Cold Dark Matter models. Accurate distance determination is crucial to avoid degeneracies in these measurements, and multiple HVS observations could clarify these issues. The discussion highlights that a supermassive black hole (SMBH) is typically considered necessary for the extreme velocities of HVSs, as they exceed typical galactic escape velocities. However, it is suggested that intermediate-mass black holes (IMBH) could also be responsible for ejecting these stars, especially if they are in close binary systems. The potential for discovering more HVSs through ongoing surveys could enhance our understanding of dark matter and galactic dynamics.
Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
107
Probing the Shape of the Galactic Halo with Hyper-Velocity Stars
Precise proper motion measurements (sigma_mu ~ 10 mkas/yr) of the recently discovered hyper-velocity star (HVS) SDSS J090745.0+024507 would yield significant constraints on the axis ratios and orientation of a triaxial model for the Galactic halo. Triaxiality of dark matter halos is predicted by Cold Dark Matter models of galaxy formation and may be used to probe the nature of dark matter. However, unless the distance to this star is determined to better than 10%, these constraints suffer from one-dimensional degeneracies, which we quantify. We show how proper motion measurements of several HVSs could simultaneously resolve the distance degeneracies of all such stars and produce a detailed picture of the triaxial halo. Additional HVSs may be found from radial velocity surveys or from parallax/proper-motion data derived from GAIA. High-precision proper-motion measurements of these stars using the Space Interferometry Mission (SIM PlanetQuest) would substantially tighten the constraints they yield on the Galactic potential.
Do they need a SMBH to sling shot them or would smaller masses do?

Garth
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Garth said:
Do they need a SMBH to sling shot them or would smaller masses do?

At first, I didn't understand your acronym - I could only come with solar for S, and I knew you didn't mean this. Then the lightbulb went on.

In any case, the authors seem to feel that a supermassive black hole is necessary, as indicated by their second paragraph.

As discussed by Brown et al. (2005), the velocity of the HVS greatly exceeds that plausible for a runaway star ejected from a binary in which one component has undergone a supernova explosion. The only known mechanism for a star to obtain such an extreme velocity is ejection from the deep potential of the massive black hole at the Galactic center, as a result of scattering with another star or tidal breakup of a binary (Hills 1988; Yu & Tremaine 2003). Only extremely close to the massive black hole, at r . 0.01 pc, can stars attain the required speeds v ≈ (2GMbh/r)1/2 & 1000 km s−1.

Regards,
George
 
Well, that paper is suggesting that the hyervelocity stars have to be ejected from close binaries disrupted by a SMBH.

The velocity of such stars are ~ 600 km.sec-1 whereas typical galactic orbital velocities < 300 km.sec-1, so they are traveling at twice this rate. That paper refers to one star with a velocity in galactic coordinates of +853 ± 12 km.sec-1, which is, at its location, twice the velocity of escape from the galaxy.

Now they say for a star to retain an escaped velocity of this magnitude the initial velocity of ejection must be > 1000 km.sec-1, which is derived from the Kelperian escape velocity of
v ≈ \sqrt {\frac{2GM_{BH}}{r}} > 1000 km.sec-1

As G ~ 7 x 10-8 c.g.s units and they suggest
r < 0.01 parsec ~ 3 x 1016 cms. and as
1000 km.sec-1 is 108 cm.sec-1 and MSolar ~ 2 x 1033 gms.


then MBH ~ 1016\frac{r}{2G} ~ 106MSolar .

However r ~ 0.01 parsec ~ 103 AU and a BH could approach much closer than that.

If the binary system were approached to 1 AU then the BH would only have to have a mass of 103MSolar.

In other words an IMBH would do, rather than a SMBH, and there may be many more of them. :wink:

Garth
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top