What Determines the Velocity of a Dropped Weight on a Toy Car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a toy car and a dropped weight. The original poster is exploring how to double the velocity of the car, which is connected to a weight via a string. The context includes concepts of energy conservation and the effects of gravitational acceleration on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial conditions of the system, including whether the car has an initial speed. Questions arise about the conservation of energy and how potential energy converts to kinetic energy as the weight falls. The original poster considers the implications of changing the weight or height to achieve the desired velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy. Some participants suggest re-evaluating the original question due to the nature of acceleration and the initial conditions of the system. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption of ignoring friction and the initial rest state of both the car and the weight. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the validity of the question, indicating potential flaws in the setup.

Gib Z
Homework Helper
Messages
3,341
Reaction score
7
Ok guys I'm having a really simple problem, its part of a school project.

I have a piece of string, on one end is a 50gram weight, the other is a toy car.

The toy car is going to be on the table, and the weight is going to be held by me until I decide to let go. I know dropping the weight will make the car move.

I know the velocity of the car is the same as the velocity of the weight (the string is going to be fully strechted the whole time).

What I want to do is to multiply the velocity of the car and therefore the weight by 2. How would I go about doing this? Do I need to include other factors like height of table or should I change the weight to double the speed?

I think E_g =mgh, v^2=2as(u=0), or something else may come useful here but I can't do it.

NOTE: Ignore friction.

Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gib Z said:
What I want to do is to multiply the velocity of the car and therefore the weight by 2.
Does the car have some initial speed? Or does it start from rest? (I'm not clear on what you want to do.)

In any case, you need to consider conservation of energy. The system (car & mass) has some initial energy (PE + KE) before you release the mass. Ignoring dissipative forces, it will have the same total energy as the mass falls (until it hits the floor). The decrease in the PE of the falling mass will equal the increase in KE of the system.
 
The car is at rest at the start, and so it the weight. When I drop the weight, the car will move. I wanted to know what to do to the weight to make the velocity of the car two times as much.

This is a question I am asking for a friend but I couldn't do it either. I just realized the question isn't great because the velocity isn't constant, its accelerating with gravity. But if anyone has any thing that sort of works please tell.Doc Al- So should i equate mg(h_0-h)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2?
 
Gib Z said:
The car is at rest at the start, and so it the weight. When I drop the weight, the car will move. I wanted to know what to do to the weight to make the velocity of the car two times as much.
Twice zero is still zero! Better rethink what you want.
Doc Al- So should i equate mg(h_0-h)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2?
Not exactly. Call the falling mass m1 and the car m2. So:
m_1g \Delta h = \frac{1}{2}(m_1 + m_2)v^2

The KE of both masses increases.
 
Sorry I realized 2*0 =0, which is why i said the question is bad as its accelerating rather than constant acceleration..sorry for wasting your time Ill tell him tomorrow the question was flawed. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K