What is the Significance of Substituting p for -p in the Klein-Gordon Equation?

[M. Kohlhaas]

I'm just reading the schroeder/peskin introduction to quantum field theory. On Page 21 there is the equation

\phi(x)=\int\frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{ \sqrt{2\omega_{\vec{p}}} } <br /> <br /> (a_{\vec{p}} e^{i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}}<br /> <br /> +a^{+}_{\vec{p}} e^{-i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}}<br /> )

and in the next step:

\phi(x)=\int\frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{ \sqrt{2\omega_{\vec{p}}} } <br /> <br /> (a_{\vec{p}} <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> +a^{+}_{\vec{-p}}<br /> )e^{i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}}

with \omega_{\vec{p}}=\sqrt{|\vec{p}|^2+m^2}

I don't understand that. When I substitute \vec{p} for -\vec{p} shouldn't the Jacobi-determinant then put a minus sign such that:

\phi(x)=\int\frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{1}{ \sqrt{2\omega_{\vec{p}}} } <br /> <br /> (a_{\vec{p}} <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> -a^{+}_{\vec{-p}}<br /> )e^{i \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}}

What's wrong with me?

 

[OOO]

I don't understand that. When I substitute \vec{p} for -\vec{p} shouldn't the Jacobi-determinant then put a minus sign

The transformation theorem for integrals involves the modulus of the jacobian, not the jacobian itself, so the sign drops out. E.g. if you think of a single integral as the area under a curve, then it doesn't make a difference when you mirror the function at the vertical axis (as long as you keep the same orientation for the integration "volume").

 

[meopemuk]

Remember that you also need to change integration limits in 3 integrals. This leads to another change of the total sign.

Eugene.

 

[M. Kohlhaas]

Thanks.