Question on both Time Dilation and Lorentz Contraction

Tyrusaur
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

There's a couple questions that I've been trying to figure out that I have not been able to make much progress on.

1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B? Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?


2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?


I think I'm probably thinking about this the wrong way, so if someone could give me some help that would be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1] you plugged in for the wrong T's; the guy on the spaceship experiences 15 seconds.

2] you can use (1) to derive 2. If the guy on the spaceship experiences half the time, and they both agree on his velocity (relative to light as they must), then the distance must be half as along.
 
Tyrusaur said:
1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B?
That's right.
Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?
Realize that the effect is completely symmetric: Earth observers will measure 60 Earth seconds for a spaceship clock to measure 30 seconds.

Don't confuse this with the "twin paradox", where the symmetry is broken.


2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?
Again, length contraction is completely symmetric. In the first case, your "stick" is in the Earth frame and is being measured by the spaceship observers (who measure the position of the ends at the same time)--the stick is measured to have contracted.

In the second case you have the stick in the spaceship frame, so it is Earth observers who see it contracted.
 
Tyrusaur said:
Hi guys,

There's a couple questions that I've been trying to figure out that I have not been able to make much progress on.

1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B? Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?

At the same time the observer on Earth sees the stopwatch of the spaceship record 30 seconds when his own watch records 60 seconds. Each sees the other's clock as running slower. This is the origin of the "twin's paradox" which is not really a paradox and can be resolved. There are many many threads on the twin's paradox here in this forum.

Tyrusaur said:
2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?


I think I'm probably thinking about this the wrong way, so if someone could give me some help that would be really appreciated.

Lo = x2 - x1 Length of rod on Earth as measured by Earth observer
L' = x2' - x1' Length of rod on Earth as measured by Spaceship observer

Gamma factor: y = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 2

Lorentz tranformation equation: x' = (x-vt)*y as per ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation


L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-vt2) - (x1-vt1))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-x1) - vt1 + vt2)*y -->

In the Earth Frame say x2 = 8 and x1 =2 and t2=t1=3 then

L' = (x2' - x1') = (8-2 -3+3)*y = 6*y = 12

which is an incorrect result! What went wrong? The ends of the rod were measured simultaneously in the frame of the Earth observer at t1=t2=3 but those two events were not simultaneous in the frame of the spaceship observer. The relativity of simultaneity tells us that clocks in the other frame are out of sync according to to their displacement from the origin proportional to t+x*v/c^2 so we can rewrite the length contraction formula as:

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-v(t2+x2*v/c^2)) - (x1-v(t1+x1*v/c^2)))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2(1-v^2/c^2)-vt2) - (x1(1-v^2/c^2)-vt1))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2/y -vt2) - (x1/y -vt1)) -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-x1)/y -vt2 +vt1)) -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = (x2-x1)/y = (8-2)/2 = 3

which is now the correct result. The reason the inverse equation cannot be applied directly is that two events that are simultaneous in one frame are not simultaneous in other frame, so we cannot simply assume vt1=vt2 and cancel them out when looking from another frame.
 
wow, thanks for the responses. they really cleared it up.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top