Question on both Time Dilation and Lorentz Contraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of time dilation and Lorentz contraction in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the implications of these concepts through hypothetical scenarios involving observers on Earth and in a spaceship moving at high speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the interpretation of time dilation, suggesting that if the Lorentz factor is 2, then a spaceship observer would measure 60 seconds while 30 seconds pass on Earth, implying the spaceship observer ages faster, which seems counterintuitive.
  • Another participant corrects the first by stating that the spaceship observer actually experiences 15 seconds, not 60 seconds, due to time dilation.
  • There is a discussion about the symmetry of time dilation, where both observers see the other's clock running slower, which relates to the "twin paradox." One participant emphasizes that this is not a true paradox and can be resolved.
  • In the context of Lorentz contraction, participants discuss the derivation of the contraction formula and question whether using reverse equations could yield contradictory results. One participant suggests that using the reverse equations leads to an incorrect conclusion, highlighting the importance of simultaneity in different reference frames.
  • Another participant elaborates on the relativity of simultaneity, explaining that events simultaneous in one frame are not necessarily simultaneous in another, which affects the application of Lorentz transformations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of time dilation and the application of Lorentz contraction equations. There is no consensus on the interpretations of the scenarios presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these relativistic effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their reasoning, particularly regarding the assumptions about simultaneity and the application of Lorentz transformations. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting relativistic effects in different reference frames.

Tyrusaur
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

There's a couple questions that I've been trying to figure out that I have not been able to make much progress on.

1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B? Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?


2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?


I think I'm probably thinking about this the wrong way, so if someone could give me some help that would be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1] you plugged in for the wrong T's; the guy on the spaceship experiences 15 seconds.

2] you can use (1) to derive 2. If the guy on the spaceship experiences half the time, and they both agree on his velocity (relative to light as they must), then the distance must be half as along.
 
Tyrusaur said:
1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B?
That's right.
Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?
Realize that the effect is completely symmetric: Earth observers will measure 60 Earth seconds for a spaceship clock to measure 30 seconds.

Don't confuse this with the "twin paradox", where the symmetry is broken.


2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?
Again, length contraction is completely symmetric. In the first case, your "stick" is in the Earth frame and is being measured by the spaceship observers (who measure the position of the ends at the same time)--the stick is measured to have contracted.

In the second case you have the stick in the spaceship frame, so it is Earth observers who see it contracted.
 
Tyrusaur said:
Hi guys,

There's a couple questions that I've been trying to figure out that I have not been able to make much progress on.

1. Time Dilation

the equation states that T' = Lorentz Factor * T0
So the Lorentz factor will always be > 1 because v < c

So then, if, let's say, there's 2 events, A and B. There are 2 reference frames, a guy on Earth and a guy moving in a spaceship at a very high speed.

Event A: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 0 s
Event B: a stopwatch on Earth displays t = 30 s

So, on earth, T0 = 30
Let's assume the lorentz factor = 2

Doesn't this mean, then, according to the equation, that the guy on the spaceship measures 60 seconds between events A and B? Doesn't this mean that in the duration of 30 seconds passing on earth, 60 seconds has passed for the guy in the spaceship, meaning that the guy on the spaceship is aging faster than the guy on earth, completely counter to the established theory?

At the same time the observer on Earth sees the stopwatch of the spaceship record 30 seconds when his own watch records 60 seconds. Each sees the other's clock as running slower. This is the origin of the "twin's paradox" which is not really a paradox and can be resolved. There are many many threads on the twin's paradox here in this forum.

Tyrusaur said:
2. Lorentz Contraction Derivation

I understand that to derive the Lorentz contraction, you use

l0 = x2-x1 reference frame of earth
l = x2' - x1' reference frame of spaceship

so then, since x1 = L (x1' + vt')
x2 = L (x2' + vt')

you can write x2-x1 = L (x2'-x1')
So, l = l0/L, the Lorentz contraction formula.

My question is, why couldn't you have also used the reverse set of equations

x1' = L (x1-vt)
x2' = L (x2-vt)

to get x1'-x2' = L (x1-x2)
and then, in this case, l = l0 * L, which is the exact opposite result?


I think I'm probably thinking about this the wrong way, so if someone could give me some help that would be really appreciated.

Lo = x2 - x1 Length of rod on Earth as measured by Earth observer
L' = x2' - x1' Length of rod on Earth as measured by Spaceship observer

Gamma factor: y = sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 2

Lorentz tranformation equation: x' = (x-vt)*y as per ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation


L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-vt2) - (x1-vt1))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-x1) - vt1 + vt2)*y -->

In the Earth Frame say x2 = 8 and x1 =2 and t2=t1=3 then

L' = (x2' - x1') = (8-2 -3+3)*y = 6*y = 12

which is an incorrect result! What went wrong? The ends of the rod were measured simultaneously in the frame of the Earth observer at t1=t2=3 but those two events were not simultaneous in the frame of the spaceship observer. The relativity of simultaneity tells us that clocks in the other frame are out of sync according to to their displacement from the origin proportional to t+x*v/c^2 so we can rewrite the length contraction formula as:

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-v(t2+x2*v/c^2)) - (x1-v(t1+x1*v/c^2)))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2(1-v^2/c^2)-vt2) - (x1(1-v^2/c^2)-vt1))*y -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2/y -vt2) - (x1/y -vt1)) -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = ((x2-x1)/y -vt2 +vt1)) -->

L' = (x2' - x1') = (x2-x1)/y = (8-2)/2 = 3

which is now the correct result. The reason the inverse equation cannot be applied directly is that two events that are simultaneous in one frame are not simultaneous in other frame, so we cannot simply assume vt1=vt2 and cancel them out when looking from another frame.
 
wow, thanks for the responses. they really cleared it up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K