Proving No Differentiable f Such That f Circ f = g

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathwizarddud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
13 replies · 3K views
mathwizarddud
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Suppose the real valued [tex]g[/tex] is defined on [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] and [tex]g'(x) < 0[/tex] for every real [tex]x[/tex]. Prove there's no differentiable [tex]f: R \rightarrow R[/tex] such that [tex]f \circ f = g[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org


My suggestion would be to look at (f o f)' (using the chain rule) and try to find some x for which this is necessarily > 0.

By the way, double posting here was unnecessary and is generally not appreciated here.
 


You want to prove that f is monotone. Then, you want to prove that f isn't monotone.
 


It doesn't matter whether f is bounded or not. It is clear that f'(x) and f'(f(x)) have opposite signs for all x. Pick any x. If f(x)=x, then this is a contradiction. If not, then by the intermediate value theorem, f' is zero at some point between x and f(x). That is essentially what the fixed point theorem says.
 


whe only need to know that f is continuous to get f(x) = x, and by assuming that f is differential it is.
 


OK, let's assume that the function is once continuously differentiable if that makes you feel better. Off the top of my head I can't think of a function that is differentiable, but where the derivative is discontinuous...
 


The fixed point theorem requires f to be bounded. Otherwise, take f(x) = x + 1

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function" for a differentiable but not C^1 function.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


If you note, I didn't use the fixed point theorem, just the intermediate value theorem (I've no idea why anyone would invoke the f.p.t. - at best its proof is enlightening for this question). And I suspect that original poster's question was phrased in terms of smooth functions making the exceptional case of a differentiable but not C^1 function important as an aside.
 


my bad didn't see that the fix point theorem needed bounded. matt_grimes proof works, if you assume that f' is continuous.
 
[tex] A = \{x\in\mathbb{R}\;|\; f'(x)>0\}[/tex]

[tex] B = \{x\in\mathbb{R}\;|\; f'(x)<0\}[/tex]

Using continuity of [tex]f[/tex] and checking some preimages, don't you get a contradiction with the fact that the real line is connected?

edit: Ouch. I wasn't thinking this all the way to the end. Never mind if this is not working.
 


Anyway, my approach was to apply the mean value theorem to show that f is injective. This implies something contradictory about f'.