Mixed Quantum States: Definition, Uses & Homework

Tac-Tics
Messages
816
Reaction score
7
I have a book on quantum computation that explains the concept of a mixed quantum state. The definition is pretty plain, you just have a boring probability distribution over a set of quantum states.

What I would like to know is why we need mixed states. How are they represented physically in nature. What kind of leverage do they give us over pure states in describing an experiment? What kinds of homework problems would you expect to solve using them ;-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tac-Tics said:
I have a book on quantum computation that explains the concept of a mixed quantum state. The definition is pretty plain, you just have a boring probability distribution over a set of quantum states.

What I would like to know is why we need mixed states. How are they represented physically in nature. What kind of leverage do they give us over pure states in describing an experiment? What kinds of homework problems would you expect to solve using them ;-)

Mixed states are standard statistical ensembles of "pure" quantum states, and they appear whenever we don't have complete information of the quantum state, pretty much in the same way as in classical physics. For instance, if you have a beam of "unpolarized" light, then you represent this as a mixed state of "up" and "down" spins for the photons. This is entirely different from a superposition of "up" and "down", which would result in just another polarization state, and which would show "interference" effects.

Now, there can be a funny interplay between the statistical properties of mixed states, and the statistical properties of the measurement results of a pure quantum state.

In a way, you can see a mixed state as "a superposition without interference effects". In fact, quantum mechanics manifests itself as the possibility to come up with different results than that of a mixed state, in a true superposition (a pure state).
Decoherence is the phenomenon of turning superpositions in mixed states.
 
vanesch said:
In a way, you can see a mixed state as "a superposition without interference effects". In fact, quantum mechanics manifests itself as the possibility to come up with different results than that of a mixed state, in a true superposition (a pure state).
Decoherence is the phenomenon of turning superpositions in mixed states.

How would you go about preparing a particle in a mixed state?
 
Tac-Tics said:
How would you go about preparing a particle in a mixed state?

The same way you prepare a dice to be in a mixed state :smile:

Seriously, a mixed state is an ensemble description. In fact, one of the peculiar things about the interplay between mixed state statistics and quantum statistics is that considering particles in a "mixed state" is indistinguishable from considering them in a randomly drawn pure state if that random drawing gives a statistically equivalent description as the mixed state. Worse, there are *different* ensembles of *different* pure states which are all observationally indistinguishable from the "mixed state". What describes a mixed state, or all of these ensembles, is the density matrix rho.

Simple example:
the mixed state "unpolarized electron".

You can see it as 50% |x+> and 50% |x-> (an ensemble of pure states)
or you can see it as 50% |z+> and 50% |z-> (another ensemble of pure states)
or you can see it as 25% |x+>, 25%|x->, 25%|z+> and 25% |z-> (yet another ensemble of pure states)
etc...

they are all observationally indistinguishable. They are all described by one and the same density matrix rho:
1/2 0
0 1/2
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top