Difference between Quantum Superposition and Mixed States

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between quantum superposition and mixed states in quantum mechanics. A mixed state arises from classical randomness, exemplified by a faulty machine preparing states |ψ1> and |ψ2> with probabilities P1 and 1-P1, respectively. In contrast, quantum superposition involves a particle existing in a combination of states |0> and |1> prior to measurement, represented by the quantum probability amplitudes α and β. The conversation also addresses the necessity of superimposed states being eigenstates of a Hermitian operator for quantum superposition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts such as superposition and mixed states.
  • Familiarity with quantum probability amplitudes and their significance.
  • Knowledge of Hermitian operators and their role in quantum systems.
  • Basic grasp of quantum entanglement and its implications for state determination.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of quantum superposition, focusing on wavefunction representation.
  • Explore the implications of mixed states in quantum information theory.
  • Learn about the role of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics and their eigenstates.
  • Investigate the concept of entanglement and its effects on mixed states in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring quantum information theory, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum states and their implications.

Trixie Mattel
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello, sorry, I do realize that this question has been asked before but there are just a few things I would like to figure out.

So, in my mind the differences lie in knowing the states that the system could end up in, and also the difference in the probabilities.

Is this thinking correct:

For a mixed state, there exists classical randomness. So for example some machine prepares a state
|ψ1> and that is the desired state I would like to get. However the machine is faulty and also prepares some state |ψ2>. The probability of getting |ψ1> is P1 and the probability of state |ψ2> being prepare is 1-P1.
The probabilities here are classical. Also |ψ2> is some state, made by the faulty machine, that I am not really aware of. I am not sure of its characteristics. Its prepared due to classical randomness. And so I get a mixed state of P1|ψ1> + P2|ψ2>Then there's for example a particle. Which can be in spin up or spin down, |0> and |1> respectively.
Here I am aware of the possible state the particle may end up in and the characteristics of those states.
However I can not be sure of which state the particle is in until i make a measurement (the wavefunction collapses) and then it will be in one state or the other. Here in QM we can think of the particle, before measurement as existing in a quantum superposition of both states. α|0> + β|1>
where α and β are not classical probabilities, they are quantum probability amplitudes. And also we can think of this quantum superposition of pure states as just another pure state before measurement.Is that a correct way of thinking of the difference between mixed states and quantum superposition?

Also, to be in quantum superposition, is it a necessity that the superimposed states are eigenstates of some hermitian operator??Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A couple of comments:

A mixed state occurs because of a lack of information. For instance, if a particle is entailed entangled (darn autocorrect) with another but the state of that particle is unknown (or it is not even known that the particle has an entanglement partner), then its state is essentially a mixed state.

Quantum systems are always in superpositions. If they are in an eigenstate of a given observable, then they are in a superposition of states of any observable that does not not commute with the first one.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Jilang and Trixie Mattel

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K