Black Hole Binding Energy Radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of binding energy in the context of black holes consuming objects. Participants explore the implications of this process on Hawking radiation and the energy dynamics involved when matter falls into a black hole. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity of radiating binding energy for an object to not escape a black hole, suggesting that added mass may increase Hawking radiation.
  • Another participant counters that added mass actually decreases Hawking radiation, raising questions about the relationship between mass and radiation.
  • Several participants discuss the role of binding energy, with one stating that any energy falling into a black hole contributes to its overall energy, including internal energy corrections.
  • One participant describes the process of an object falling into a massive body, transforming gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy, and the implications for binding energy when the object is unable to escape.
  • A participant introduces kinetic theory, suggesting that the probability of particles escaping a gravitational attractor is related to the ratio of internal kinetic energy to binding potential energy.
  • There is a mention that even if a particle cannot escape a black hole, it may still influence the area outside the black hole's event horizon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between binding energy, Hawking radiation, and the dynamics of energy when objects fall into black holes. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about binding energy and its necessity, as well as the dependence on definitions of energy and mass in the context of black holes. The mathematical relationships discussed are not fully resolved.

valjok
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I don't know whether this is more appropriate forum than the astrophysics as far as the black holes are conserned... Anyway

I would like to know what happens to the binding energy when a black hole eats an object? It is necessary to radiate it in order the object would not escape. However, everybody reports that nothing besides the Hawking radiation (temperature is inverse proportional to mass) escapes the black hole. Is it right to think that the added mass increases the Hawking radiation (the linear drop in temperature is compensated by the larger hole square) and the binding enerty escapes in this form?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I would like to know what happens to the binding energy when a black hole eats an object? It is necessary to radiate it in order the object would not escape.
Why is it necessary?
Is it right to think that the added mass increases the Hawking radiation
Added mass decreases the Hawking radiation.
 
mathman said:
Why is it necessary?

Why binding energy is necessary?
 
valjok said:
Why binding energy is necessary?

According to standard theory, any energy that falls into a black hole simply ends up contributing to its overall energy (and the corresponding mass). The overall energy of the falling object includes any internal energy corrections (such as positive thermal energy or negative binding energy) within a composite object.
 
Despite my failure to understand Jonathan's writing, I think I understand the process now. As some object falls onto a massive body, it accelerates until the center of attraction. The potential energy of gravity is transformed into kinetic energy of speed. The body then flies away while slows down (kinetic-to-potential back transform). In order to prevent the fly away, the falling object must be bound (smashed) to the planet. Normally, this is done by dissipating the kinetic energy, which is later radiated in the form of heat. As long as Hawking is not concerned, it is not radiated in case of BH. That's simple.
 
The kinetic theory tells that the particles in thermal motion occasionally get enaugh energy to escape the attractor. The probability is proportional to the ratio between the internal kinetic energy (the temperature) and the binding potential energy: P = exp(W/kT). When the ratio is positive, the probability is higher than 1 - the particle must escape the potential hole.

The object attracted by a planet is accelerated and has the right energy to escape the planet when it hits it. Even if does not escape, it adds to the planet temperature, thus reducing its binding energy. The extra energy contributed might be so high that the binding energy of the planet is exceeded -- something must fly away. So is with the planet = BH.

BTW, even the fact that a BH particle cannot escape from BH to infinity does not mean it cannot show up at any distance behind the BH radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K