Comparing Mathematica & Maple: Which is Better for Students?

  • Context: Mathematica 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sparkster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple Mathematica
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing Mathematica and Maple as computational tools for students, particularly in the context of transitioning from undergraduate to graduate studies. Participants explore their experiences with both software, considering aspects such as usability, aesthetics, and compatibility with academic requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares their experience using Mathematica in undergraduate studies and questions whether switching to Maple for graduate school is necessary or beneficial.
  • Another participant suggests that Maple may be visually more appealing than Mathematica but argues that if one is already accustomed to Mathematica, there may be no compelling reason to switch, provided Mathematica meets their computational needs.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential difficulty of translating work between Maple and Mathematica, particularly if specific Maple packages are required by professors.
  • Participants discuss the importance of understanding the requirements of their courses and suggest contacting professors or peers for guidance on software usage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether one software is definitively better than the other; participants express differing opinions on the necessity of switching from Mathematica to Maple and the implications of doing so.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific requirements of their courses and how much reliance on software will be necessary, particularly in pure mathematics versus applied contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Students transitioning from undergraduate to graduate studies in mathematics or related fields, particularly those considering the use of computational software for their coursework.

sparkster
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
At the undergrad school I attended, they used Mathematica. I found a copy of the student edition selling for $20 in the book store, so I bought, upgraded to 4.2 for $40 and was a happy math student.

The grad school I'm starting at next week uses Maple. I can get the student version for $112 through the campus computer store.

Now I've never used Maple, so I was wondering if it was better, or even all that different. I already have a good math program, so I really don't want to invest in another one.

Any comments/advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maple is probably a bit "prettier" than Mathematica, but, if you're already used to Mathematica and are not doing any sort of computations that are outside the capabilities of Mathematica, there's no reason (IMO) to switch. It will be easy to translate between Maple input and Mathematica input.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Maple is probably a bit "prettier" than Mathematica, but, if you're already used to Mathematica and are not doing any sort of computations that are outside the capabilities of Mathematica, there's no reason (IMO) to switch. It will be easy to translate between Maple input and Mathematica input.

- Warren
So I do some stuff on my home computer and, for some reason, want to do something with it at school, it wouldn't be difficult? Or did I misunderstand you?
 
Well, there's no automatic translation from Maple to Matlab notebooks, but it's easy enough to do. Both programs offer a lot of the exact same tools, but sometimes call them by different names. The syntax is also very different, but neither is really that hard to learn.

Beware that if your professor has written any sort of Maple packages that you must use to do your work, you're going to be out of luck with Mathematica.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
Well, there's no automatic translation from Maple to Matlab notebooks, but it's easy enough to do. Both programs offer a lot of the exact same tools, but sometimes call them by different names. The syntax is also very different, but neither is really that hard to learn.

Beware that if your professor has written any sort of Maple packages that you must use to do your work, you're going to be out of luck with Mathematica.

- Warren
Yeah, that's the main thing that I was worried about. I'd much rather be at my house working on stuff than at the computer lab. Although, I am studying pure math, so I'm not sure how much I'll need to worry about all this. I'm taking a linear algebra class, and as an undergrad, my linear prof included mathematica assignments. I'm assuming that the grad class will focus more on theory and less on application.
 
I'd say the best thing to do is simply call up your prof and ask him. :smile:

- Warren
 
chroot said:
I'd say the best thing to do is simply call up your prof and ask him. :smile:

- Warren
What a novel idea! I haven't met him yet, but I assume he'll be at the department orientation next week. Hey! I could even ask some of the other grad students who have had these classes!

Wow...talking to actual live people about things rather than posting on a message board...wonderful idea...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K