Additivity and $\sigma$-Additivity of a Measure on $\mathbb{N}$ with Example

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LHeiner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of additivity and σ-additivity of a measure defined on the set of natural numbers, specifically using the counting measure. The measure is defined as $\mu(A)=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid _\mathbb{N} (A \cap [1,n])$, where $\xi\mid _\mathbb{N}$ is the counting measure. The participants analyze the conditions under which this measure is additive and σ-additive, concluding that while it is additive, it fails to be σ-additive due to the inability to exchange limits and sums in certain cases. An example set is provided where the measure does not exist, highlighting the complexities involved in measure theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measure theory concepts, particularly additivity and σ-additivity.
  • Familiarity with the counting measure on natural numbers.
  • Knowledge of limits and series in mathematical analysis.
  • Basic comprehension of set theory and unions of sets.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the counting measure in detail.
  • Learn about the conditions under which limits can be exchanged with sums in measure theory.
  • Explore examples of sets where measures may not exist or are undefined.
  • Investigate the implications of σ-additivity in various contexts within measure theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus or analysis, and anyone interested in the foundations of measure theory and its applications in real analysis.

LHeiner
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey

i'm given a measure on $\Omega =\mathbb{N}, A \subset \mathbb{N}$ and should check additivity as well as $\sigma$-additiviy. Additionally i should give an example for a set where $\mu(A)$ is not defined:

$\mu(A)=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid _\mathbb{N} (A \cap [1,n])$ with finite limit.
whereas $\xi\mid _\mathbb{N}$ is the counting measure on $\mathbb{N}$

Can anybody help me with this?
Appreciate it, thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the additivity

\mu(A\cup B) =\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\frac{1}{n}\xi_\mathbb{N}((A\cap [1,n])\cup(B\cap [1,n]))}

Now just apply the additivity of the counting measure and split the limit.

For \sigma-additivity, you will eventually need to exchange limit and series. But this should be no problem since the series has positive terms.

As for the example where \mu does not exist. The only problem with \mu might be that the limit does not exist. This happens with the following set
\{n\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~n>0\}\cup \{2n+1/2~\vert~n>0\}

Just ask if something is not clear...

The measure \mu can actually be regarded as the limiting average elements of a set. It also poses some interesting questions. Like: what is the measure of the primes? or what is the measure of the squares?
 
Ok that means:

$\mu (A\cup B)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N}(A\cap[1,n])\cup (B\cap[1,n]))=\\<br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} [(A\cap[1,n])+ (B\cap[1,n])]=\\<br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (A\cap[1,n])+\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (B\cap[1,n])=\mu(A)+\mu(B)$

and $\sigma$-add:

$\mu(\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_i)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_i \cap [1,n])\\<br /> =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i \cap [1,n])\\<br /> =\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (A_i \cap [1,n])= \sum \mu(A_i)$

But i can't see why $\mu$ has no limit for the set ${n \in \mathbb{N}\vert n&gt;0}\cup \{2n+1/2\vert n&gt;0}$
 
The "measure" isn't sigma-additive, e.g. consider a countable union of singletons.
 
Hmm, in your proof of additivity, you say

\xi[(A\cap [1,n])+(B\cap[1,n])]

You can of course not take the sum of two sets. That needs to be

\xi(A\cap [1,n])+\xi(B\cap [1,n])

As noticed by bpet, \mu is not \sigma-additive. The reason for this is, that you can not in general exchange limit with sum. This is sometimes allowed, but not in this case.

For convenience, I'll give two situations in which you CAN exchange limit with sum (notice that none of these two situations apply here).

We have that

\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{x_{n,k}}=\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_{n,k}}}

if one of following situations occurs
1) \forall k: m\leq n~\Rightarrow~x_{m,k}\leq x_{n,k} and every x_{n,k} is positive.
2) There exists a sequence (y_k)_k such that \sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{|y_k|}&lt;+\infty and \forall k,n: |x_{n,k}|\leq y_k

You will prove these theorems later in it's ful generality (i.e. with integrals instead of sums).




Now for the set A=\{n \in \mathbb{N}\vert n&gt;0\}\cup \{2n+(1/2)\vert n&gt;0\}. Just calculate for every n, how many elements are in A\cap[1,n]. (be sure to discriminate between the cases n is even/n is odd). Then divide this number by n and take the limit.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry now I am completely confused :confused::confused:

i think my problem is that maybe i don't completely understand the function at all. i mean isn't $\mu(A)$ always 0?

If i look at A\left \{1,2,5,8,9,10 \right \} \Rightarrow \mu(A)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi (A \cap [1,n])= \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi ({1,2,5,8,9,10})=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{6}{n}=0

i think measure (&set) theory is not my speciality:frown:
 
Don't worry, everybody is confused in the beginning of measure theory. It grows on you.

But the measure \mu is certainly not zero. For finite sets, it is zero. But let's calculate \mu(\mathbb{N}).

We have that \mathbb{N}\cap [1,n]=\{1,...,n\}. So \xi(\mathbb{N}\cap [1,n])=n. So

\frac{1}{n} \xi(\mathbb{N}\cap [1,n])= 1

Taking the limit, yields that \mu(\mathbb{N})=1.
 
okey so i think i now get why the function is not \sigma additive, because if you apply the function to sum of countable unions of singletons you don't get the same as if you sum up the function on each of the sets.
am i right?

so then i only have to figure out the last part the set for which there exists no limit
 
  • #10
Yes, you are right.
 
  • #11
still confused with this set, why is there no limit, even if i distinguish between odd/even i always get a countable set or where is my error?

n..even= 2k
A=\left \{2k\right \}\cup \left \{4k+0,5\right \}=\left \{2,4,4.5,6,8,8.5...\right \}\cap [1,n]\rightarrow \xi(..)=n
n..odd=2k+1
A=\left \{2k+1\right \}\cup \left \{4k+1,5\right \}=\left \{1,3,5,5.5,7...\right \}\cap [1,n]\rightarrow \xi(..)=n
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K