Having trouble with Hydrostatics problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theelectricchild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrostatics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a hydrostatics problem involving a 3.15 kg piece of wood with a specific gravity of 0.5 floating on water. The objective is to determine the minimum mass of lead required to make the wood sink. The participants derive the necessary equations, including the relationship between the average density of the wood and lead combined and the density of water. The final calculations suggest that approximately 3.4558 kg of lead is needed to achieve this, although an alternative method yields a different result of 2.00 kg using seawater density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Knowledge of specific gravity and density calculations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Basic principles of hydrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle in detail
  • Learn about specific gravity and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Explore density calculations for various materials, including lead and wood
  • Investigate hydrostatic pressure and its effects on submerged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and environmental science, particularly those dealing with fluid mechanics and hydrostatics problems.

Theelectricchild
Messages
260
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

The problem statement reads: A 3.15kg piece of wood (Spec. Grav. = 0.5) floats on water. What is the minimum mass of lead, hung from it by a string will cause it to sink?

Heres my reasoning. Since the log is floating, I know that it is in equilibrium, and therefore the buoyant force Fb = force due to gravity. Thus Fb = 3.15kg *9.8m/s^2.

But I also know that an object will float on water if \rho_w > \rho_o

I know the specific gravity as 0.5 so I know that the density of the wood is one half that of the water! So I've concluded that I must add enough lead to make the density of wood + density of added lead = density of water to get a minimum to sink. My only problem is, if density is m/V, how would i know what V to use?

Ok so let me think this--- I know mass of wood, and I know the denisty of it is 1/2 of water. So set 1/2 water density = m/V where m is the mass of the wood. Then solve for V and ill know the woods volume. But i Have no idea where to go from here! Sure i can look up density of lead in the book, but i don't know how much MASS to add! Would anyone happen to know how to approach this? THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok here's a little more thought into it--- Lead is a defined material that will always have the same density no matter how small a chunk or large a chunk you have. So BY itself even the tinniest piece of lead will sink, But interestingly when you add that piece to the wood there will be an amt that the wood will still float.
 
Theelectricchild said:
So I've concluded that I must add enough lead to make the density of wood + density of added lead = density of water to get a minimum to sink.
This is a perfectly good way to approach this problem: Set the average density equal to that of water:
\frac{m_{wood} + m_{lead}}{V_{wood} + V_{lead}} = \rho_{water}
Since you know that \rho = m/V, you can rewrite this equation in terms of masses and densities only and solve for the only unknown, the mass of the lead.
 
THank you doc al, using that information here's what I did:

Since we know the mass as 3.15kg, and we know SG = 0.5, then we know m/V = 500 kg/m^3 (half density of water) and thus can solve for Volume of wood = 0.0063 m^3.

Since the woods floating, we have a statics problem with Fnet = 0. Thus we need to add a mass of lead that increases the net density of wood + lead = to that of water to get a MIN for the wood/lead combo to sink.

Therefore I set the avg density of water ill denote with p as:

p(water) = [m(wood) + m(lead)] / [(V(wood) + V(lead)]

Since we know p = m/V, I attempted rewriting this equation in terms of the masses and densities only and solve for the only unknown, the mass of the lead:

So thus 1000 = (3.15kg + mlead) / (0.0063 m^3 + Vlead)

Although this eqn has 2 unknowns, we still know the common ratio of mlead/Vlead = density of lead = 11.3E3 kg/m^3

Thus... Multiplying both sides by (0.0063 +Vlead) we have

3.15kg + mlead = 6.3 +1000Vlead

then: 3.15kg + 1000Vlead = mlead

Divide both sides by V and get

3.15/Vlead + 1000 = 11.3E3

Solve for V lead then sub back into mlead/Vlead = 11.3E3 and get that mlead = 3.4558 kg


But then...

I looked at it a little differently instead and thought to increase the total mass of the (wood + lead) to equal the mass of the displaced water,
thus the buoyant force will be canceled at this point (and a little more mass will make it sink...)

since we know the volume of the wood, we know when it is totally submerged the displaced water volume will be the same, and we can then determine the buoyant force of the water = mg = (volume displaced water * water density)g = (mass of wood + mass of lead)*g
thus
(volume displaced water * water density) = (mass of wood + mass of lead)

and so I got Mlead = 2.00 kg (using sea water density 1.025 x 10^3...)

Would this method be wrong? Is this first answer of 3.45kg the more accurate one then? thanks
 
Well this is my last bump for the thread, I would reaaaaly appreciate anyone checking the validity of my method. Thank you :smile:
 
the buoyant force also acts upon the lead. so you must take it into account. it will lead back to what Doc Al has given you.
The total weight of lead and wood = The buoyant force acts on them
g(m_{lead}+m_{wood})=V_{lead}\rho_{water}g+V_{wood}\rho_{water}g
\rho_{water}=\frac{m_{lead}+m_{wood}}{V_{lead}+V_{wood}}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K