Are Virtual Particles Real According to the Dynamic Casimir Effect Study?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the reality of virtual particles in the context of the Dynamic Casimir Effect (DCE) study. While the paper discusses virtual particles in a colloquial manner, there are alternative explanations that may not require their existence. Participants note that a referenced paper only addresses the static Casimir effect and is not relevant to the DCE. The consensus is that the DCE provides insights but does not definitively prove the reality of virtual particles. Overall, the topic remains complex and open to interpretation.
dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1105/1105.4714v1.pdf

Does this paper shed any light on whether virtual particles are real, or not?

They are speaking colloquially, as if they are real, but it sounds like there are complementary explanations that do not need to use virtual particles. Not sure, though - it's over my head.

My understanding is also that the following paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158) addressed only the static casimir effect, and does not apply to the DCE on the paper above. Is that true?

Thanks!
dm4b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. The paper you linked to focuses on the static Casimir effect and does not apply to the DCE discussed in the paper you mentioned.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K