Emergence of Superstring from Pure Spinor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Ichiro Oda's paper "Emergence of Superstring from Pure Spinor," which presents a novel approach to deriving the pure spinor formalism for superparticles and superstrings using BRST formalism. Oda proposes that both the string variable $x^m$ and the space-time spinor $\theta^\alpha$ emerge as Faddeev-Popov ghosts, suggesting a connection to topological field theory. The paper challenges traditional methods by aiming to derive bosonic fields as "ghosts for ghosts," expanding the understanding of supersymmetry within the context of twistor theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of BRST formalism in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with pure spinor formalism and its applications in string theory
  • Knowledge of conformal field theory (CFT) and its role in perturbative string theory
  • Basic concepts of topological field theory and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of pure spinor formalism in string theory
  • Study the role of Faddeev-Popov ghosts in BRST quantization
  • Explore the relationship between twistor theory and supersymmetry
  • Investigate the d=10 generalization of Virasoro constraints in string theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, string theorists, and researchers interested in advanced topics in quantum field theory and the mathematical foundations of string theory.

MTd2
Gold Member
Messages
2,019
Reaction score
25
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3548

Emergence of Superstring from Pure Spinor

Ichiro Oda
(Submitted on 17 Jun 2011)
Starting with a classical action where a pure spinor $\lambda^\alpha$ is only a fundamental and dynamical variable, the pure spinor formalism for superparticle and superstring is derived by following the BRST formalism. In this formalism, not only the string variable $x^m$ but also the space-time spinor $\theta^\alpha$ are emerged as the Faddeev-Popov (FP) ghosts of a topological symmetry and its reducible symmetry. This study suggests that the fundamental theory behind the pure spinor formalism of the superstring might be a topological field theory.*****************************

I thought that the title of this paper was totally ambitious, so, I am posting it here for comments. Mitchel Porter and others, what can you say about this paper? Is it really amazing as the title implies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The second paragraph has to be the most succinct explanation ever of what the pure spinor formalism is about, and the third paragraph is the ingenious idea behind the paper in one sentence. It certainly starts well...
 
I believe I now understand the paper somewhat better.

In perturbative string theory, you use a d=2 CFT which lives on Riemann surfaces (the worldsheet of interacting strings). Normally, the CFT includes some bosonic fields (the space-time coordinates of the string), some fermionic fields (superpartners of those coordinates), and ghost fields from BRST quantization. In the pure spinor formalism, the ghosts are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_spinor" .

http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1147" , Berkovits proposed to start with the bosonic fields and the pure spinor fields, and to derive the fermions as the ghosts. (Lisi wanted to do something similar with E8 theory, but the difficulty is to get the right statistics for the ghosts.) Usually you would use a "Virasoro constraint", but here he used a d=10 generalization of the constraint from twistor theory. The resulting theory is supersymmetric, so he calls it supersymmetry emerging from a twistor-like constraint.

Oda wants to go further and have the CFT bosons emerging as ghosts as well. So he would be starting with a worldsheet CFT consisting of nothing but pure spinors, with the bosons emerging as "ghosts for ghosts", second-order ghosts for the fermionic ghosts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 163 ·
6
Replies
163
Views
28K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K