Does this theorem have a name?

  • Thread starter Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a theorem relating the integral of the cross product of the unit tangent and unit normal vectors over a curve C to the mean curvature of a surface S. The equation presented, which can be derived from Stokes' theorem, is expressed as the integral of the tangent and normal vectors equating to a function of the mean curvature. The mean curvature H is defined as half the trace of the second fundamental form, linking it to the divergence of the normal vector. The derivation clarifies the relationship between the geometry of the surface and the integrals involved. The theorem appears to be a known result, although its specific name is not identified.
techmologist
Messages
305
Reaction score
12
For a surface S bounded by a curve C,

\int_{C} \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}ds = -2\int_{S} H \mathbf{n}da

t is the unit tangent to C, and n is the unit normal to the surface S. H is the mean curvature of S. It can be derived from Stokes' theorem, but it seems like the kind of result that might have been known earlier.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For any constant vector c,

\mathbf{c} \cdot \int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_C (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{t} ds =\int_S \nabla \times (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{n}da

Using the vector identity

\nabla \times (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) = \mathbf{b} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{a} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{b} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{a} ) \mathbf{b} + (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} )\mathbf{a}

and the fact that c is constant, the above integral becomes

\int_S [\mathbf{c}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n})\mathbf{c} ] \cdot \mathbf{n} da <br /> =<br /> \mathbf{c} \cdot \int_S (\nabla \mathbf{n} ) \cdot \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n }) \mathbf{n} da

The first term in the integrand is zero, since it is just the gradient of the length of the unit normal. Also, since the vector c was arbitrary, its dot product with the integral can be dropped:


\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = -\int_S (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n} ) \mathbf{n} da

Depending on how you define the normal (outward or inward), div n = -2H up to a sign*. So that gives the result

\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_S 2H \mathbf{n} da

I had an extra minus sign in the first post.


* The mean curvature H of a surface is equal to half the trace of the second fundamental form B: 2H = gjkbjk. The components of the second fundamental form can be defined as

b_{jk} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = - n^i_{{ };k}\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{x}_i = -n^i_{{ };k}g_{ij}

Multiplying both sides by the inverse of g_ij and then summing the diagonal elements gives

g^{jk}b_{jk} = - n^k_{{ };k} = -\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n}
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K