Control volumes and Reynolds transport theorem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Reynolds transport theorem (RTT) and its application to control volumes in fluid dynamics. Participants explore the necessary relationships between a control volume and a system of fixed mass, particularly in the context of moving and deforming control volumes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessary relationship between the control volume and the system for the RTT to hold true, suggesting that they must coincide at time t for the integrals to be valid.
  • Another participant states that typically, a control volume encloses a consistent material amount of fluid, implying that the relative velocity at the control volume boundary is simply the fluid velocity.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of the control volume containing the same material fluid elements over time, emphasizing the physical interpretation of volume integrals.
  • One participant provides an example involving a rocket losing mass, discussing how the RTT can be applied in this context, and concludes that the control volume and system must coincide at time t for the argument to be valid.
  • Another participant expresses appreciation for the example provided, indicating it as a good application of RTT.
  • One participant presents a general equation for a moving and deforming control volume, discussing the material derivative and how it relates to the RTT, noting that at time t, the two control volumes coincide.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of the control volume and system coinciding at time t, with some suggesting it is essential while others explore the implications of different configurations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the strict requirements for the RTT to apply in various scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific cases, such as fluid dynamics and rocket propulsion, but do not resolve the broader implications of RTT in varying contexts. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in interpreting volume integrals over time-dependent volumes.

etotheipi
If we consider a system of fixed mass as well as a control volume which is free to move and deform, then Reynolds transport theorem says that for any extensive property ##B_{S}## of that system (e.g. momentum, angular momentum, energy, etc.) then$$\frac{dB_{S}}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} \int_{CV} \beta \rho dV + \int_{CS} \beta \rho (\mathbf{V}_r \cdot \mathbf{n}) dA$$where ##\beta := \frac{dB_{S}}{dm}## is the quantity per unit mass and ##\mathbf{V}_r## is the relative velocity of the matter/fluid at the boundary w.r.t. the velocity of the control volume boundary. ##CV## and ##CS## denote control volume and control surface respectively.

My question is, what is the necessary relationship between the control volume and the system in order for that general relation to hold true? I have the feeling that the system and the control volume must coincide at time ##t## when the integrals are evaluated (but they will not necessarily coincide at ##t+dt##), but I am not certain of this. My reasoning was because if we consider a case where the control volume and system are completely separated (no overlap), then that relation is definitely wrong.

Any clarification would be much appreciated, thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually you choose a control volume enclosing a certain material amount of fluid, i.e., consisting of one and the same material fluid elements at any time. Then ##\vec{V}_r## is simply the fluid velocity (along the boundary of the control volume).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
vanhees71 said:
Usually you choose a control volume enclosing a certain material amount of fluid, i.e., consisting of one and the same material fluid elements at any time. Then ##\vec{V}_r## is simply the fluid velocity (along the boundary of the control volume).

That does make sense, e.g. at time ##t## we consider a system of fluid that is instantaneously inside our (in this case, fixed) control volume, and we find that for instance ##\vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{P}}{dt} + \dot{\vec{P}}_{lost} - \dot{\vec{P}}_{gained}##, and like you say the ##\vec{V}_r## in ##\dot{\vec{P}}_{lost} - \dot{\vec{P}}_{gained} = \int_{CS} \rho \vec{V}(\vec{V}_r \cdot \vec{n}) dA## would just be the fluid velocity in the lab frame

But in the general case, must the boundaries of the control volume and system still coincide at time ##t##?
 
Well, of course you can calculate volume integrals over any time-dependent volume you like, but then it's hard to interpret physically I'd say. Do you have a specific hydro problem, where you need this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
vanhees71 said:
Well, of course you can calculate volume integrals over any time-dependent volume you like, but then it's hard to interpret physically I'd say. Do you have a specific hydro problem, where you need this?

I did learn this in the context of fluid dynamics but I was just thinking about how it could be applied to a rocket that is losing mass. I imagined that we could construct a control volume that is fixed w.r.t. the rocket, and that at some time ##t## we consider a system defined by all the particles in the control volume at time ##t##. Then we would have from RTT$$\vec{F}_{ext} = \frac{d\vec{p}_S}{dt} = \frac{d\vec{p}_{CV}}{dt} + \frac{d\vec{p}_{lost}}{dt}$$If ##\vec{v}_{rel}## is the velocity of the fuel w.r.t. the rocket then$$\frac{d\vec{p}_{lost}}{dt} = -\dot{m}(\vec{v} + \vec{v}_{rel})$$so we end up with $$\vec{F}_{ext} + \vec{v}_{rel} \frac{dm}{dt} = m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}$$that is the expected formula. I believe we must also make the control volume arbitrarily large so that we can ignore interactions between ejected particles and the rocket. That would mean that we also need to assume the rocket has been traveling for long enough that there are exhaust particles crossing the far away boundary.

But I realized that for this argument to work, the control volume and system must coincide at time ##t##. But luckily, I think that is a requirement for RTT :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Great! That's really a very nice example for the application of Reynold's transport theorem!
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
The way I understand this is as follows:

For a moving and deforming control volume, the general equation is:
$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\int_{CV}\beta \rho dV\right)=\int_{CV}\frac{\partial (\beta \rho)}{\partial t}dV+\int{\beta \rho \mathbf{v}_{CV}}\centerdot \mathbf{n}dA$$For the special case in which every point on the control volume surface is moving at the same velocity as the fluid (i.e., with a fixed mass of fluid within the control volume), we define the material derivative as D/Dt:
$$\frac{D}{Dt}\left(\int_{CV}\beta \rho dV\right)=\int_{CV}\frac{\partial (\beta \rho)}{\partial t}dV+\int{\beta \rho \mathbf{v}_{fluid}}\centerdot \mathbf{n}dA$$Combining these two equations gives: $$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\int_{CV}\beta \rho dV\right)=\frac{D}{Dt}\left(\int_{CV}\beta \rho dV\right)+\int{\beta \rho \mathbf{v}_{r}}\centerdot \mathbf{n}dA$$where, at time t, the two control volumes coincide
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K