Determining if a vector b is a linear combination of vectors a1,a2,a3

Click For Summary
To determine if vector b is a linear combination of vectors a1, a2, and a3, an augmented matrix was created and row reduced. The resulting reduced row echelon form (RREF) shows that there are pivots in the first two columns, indicating that a1 and a2 are linearly independent. The last row being all zeros suggests that the system has infinite solutions, meaning b can be expressed as a linear combination of a1, a2, and a3. The coefficients of the linear combination are derived from the RREF, confirming that b is indeed a linear combination of the given vectors. This clarification resolves the initial confusion about the relationship between the vectors and the span in R3.
nglatz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
given a1=[1,-2.0] , a2=[0,1,2] , a3=[5,-6,8] , b=[2,-1,6] determine if b is a linear combination of a1, a2, a3.

I put these vectors into an augmented matrix and row reduced. My result was columns 1 and 2 having pivots and the last row being all zeros. Please help me understand how this results in b NOT being a linear combination of a1, a2, a3.

The only thing i can think of is that vectors a1, a2, a3 do not span all of R3 and b is not part of the plane that a1, a2, a3 span. If this is the case, please explain how i can see this from the augmented matrix in RREF.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You've misinterpreted the results of the row reduction.

First let's start with the result:
\left[ \begin {array}{cccc} 1&amp;0&amp;5&amp;2\\ -2&amp;1&amp;-6&amp;-1<br /> \\ 0&amp;2&amp;8&amp;6\end {array} \right]<br /> \to \left[ \begin {array}{cccc} 1&amp;0&amp;5&amp;2\\ 0&amp;1&amp;4&amp;3<br /> \\ 0&amp;0&amp;0&amp;0\end {array} \right] <br />

So the coefficients of a linear combination x_1a_1 + x_2a_2 + x_3a_3 = b take the form:
<br /> \left[\begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3<br /> \end{array}\right] \in<br /> \left\{<br /> \left[\begin{array}{c}<br /> 2 \\ 3 \\ 0<br /> \end{array}\right] +<br /> t\left[\begin{array}{c}<br /> -5 \\ -4 \\ 1<br /> \end{array}\right] \|<br /> t \in \mathbb{F}<br /> \right\}<br />
 
ok. that clears things up. thanks so much
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K