Does spacelike separation have anything to do with non-locality?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the relationship between spacelike separation and non-locality in quantum mechanics (QM). It asserts that while events separated by spacelike intervals may appear to be correlated, they do not influence each other, as QM operates under fully local dynamics. The conversation also touches on concepts like ADS/CFT correspondence and the nature of black holes and white holes in the context of multiverse theory. Ultimately, the consensus is that non-local effects do not imply a causal relationship between spacelike separated events.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with spacetime concepts and intervals
  • Knowledge of ADS/CFT correspondence
  • Basic grasp of multiverse theory and black hole physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of ADS/CFT correspondence in quantum field theory
  • Study the nature of black holes and white holes in higher-dimensional spaces
  • Explore the concept of spacelike intervals in the context of quantum entanglement
  • Investigate the local dynamics of quantum mechanics and its implications for causality
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of spacetime and non-locality in quantum theory.

dst
Messages
379
Reaction score
0
The cause-effect relationship of timelike events is fairly self-evident.

But I was wondering, do non-local effects of QM "synchronise" events that are separated along spacelike intervals? Could there be some kind of co-dependent arising, such that if event X happens in one region of the universe then event Y will certainly happen in a spacelike separated region?

There would be no information transfer and neither event can be said to have caused the other, because obviously what caused X is what caused X and what caused Y is what caused Y. But all things come from t=0, meaning they could be fundamentally synchronised by virtue of the behaviour of spacetime in its early days.

If things like ADS/CFT have any bearing on reality, then surely spacelike separated events aren't quite as separated as we think they are? Rather they would be perfectly coincidental.

I have an intuition that what we think are "black holes" are actually just the "edges"/"corners" of the universe reflecting information back out. These "edges" exist dynamically in relation to spacetime geometry, explaining why they appear and disappear at convenient points.

dst said:
Well, how about pair production in the multiverse?

That is to say, a 4D white hole and black hole pair form in a higher dimensional space.

Because they are pair produced, they exist in perfect equilibrium at t=0. No quantum fluctuations.

They would interact with their surroundings but the white hole would feed the black hole (us) so the black hole gets bigger and bigger. This would produce the appearance of inflation. When it gets to a tipping point, the white hole is now the black hole and the black hole is now the white hole, they become one "bubble" in the multiverse. At this point, the bubble is formed and can no longer be causally affected by fluctuations in the rest of the multiverse.

That would manifest as the "surface of last scattering"/the end of inflation. This would give off the appearance of a standalone 4D universe which has an "imprint" proportioning everything (the original quantum fluctuations imaged by the horizon).
Everything is rapidly moving away from us, faster and faster. Somewhere along the line there will be a point of no return. The time at which this point occurred depending on the geometry of our sphere of observation relative to the universe at large. The stars will fade into what we percieve as nothing. All that would remain is the causal trace of all the information present at the precise boundary where the acceleration finally overwhelmed the information supply. In the local geocentric universe, there will be just Earth, if it's still around as Earth and that would perhaps soon be ripped apart too depending on spacetime geometry at that point.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
dst said:
The cause-effect relationship of timelike events is fairly self-evident.

But I was wondering, do non-local effects of QM "synchronise" events that are separated along spacelike intervals? Could there be some kind of co-dependent arising, such that if event X happens in one region of the universe then event Y will certainly happen in a spacelike separated region?
Nope. Quantum mechanics is fully-local. It has some effect which appear to be non-local, but all of the dynamics are fully local.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
904
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K