Spin and Polarization: Understanding the Spin Operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter peterpang1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization Spin
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the spin operator in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to spin-up and spin-down states in a 2D system. The spin operator for the z-direction, S_z, is defined and expressed in terms of the angular momentum values for these states. The inner products of the spin operator are evaluated to form a matrix representation, demonstrating the relationship between spin states and their measurements. The conversation also touches on the total orbital angular momentum and total spin, emphasizing the importance of constructing the total spin operator S^2, which commutes with the individual spin components. Overall, the thread seeks clarification on these concepts and their applications in quantum mechanics.
peterpang1994
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Recently, I read an article about spin and polarization (http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s9-04/9-04.htm) , but I don't understand how the spin operator defined, can anyone give so help? any help would be great!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider if we have a complete set of vectors in 2D characterized experimentally by spin-up and spin-down in the z direction:
<br /> \mathbb{I}=|\uparrow\rangle \langle \uparrow |+|\downarrow\rangle \langle \downarrow |<br />
Then experimentally we find we can only observe two different numbers corresponding to two different physical situations, namely we measure something and it is spining up, or spining down with a number value for its angular momentum,
<br /> S_{z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}|\uparrow\rangle \langle \uparrow |-\frac{\hbar}{2}|\downarrow\rangle \langle \downarrow |<br />
Now let's consider the different possibilities for measuring these values along the z-axis, this is given by
<br /> \sum_{n,m=1}^{2}\langle n|S_{z}|m\rangle<br />
where by we examine the different situations
<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\uparrow\rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\uparrow \rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br />
These can be combined into a single object and the inner products can be evaluated explicitly to give
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\uparrow\rangle &amp; \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle \\<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\uparrow \rangle &amp; \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{\hbar}{2}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_{z}<br />
This is one component of the spin matrices. a similar method yields the other two.
 
thank you very much. Is that the operator you suggested in only focused on the electron in a hydrogen atom? And I am still having problems on the total orbital angular momentum and the total spin.
 
It's for the z-component of the total spin. Once one has constructed all three components they can calculate S^2=\mathbf{S}\cdot \mathbf{S} which is the total spin operator (squared). This operator commutes with all three components of the spin.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K