Derivation of the momentum-energy relation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Relation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the momentum-energy relation, specifically the equation E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and concepts related to special relativity, including the use of rapidity and hyperbolic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach using the relations p=γmu and E=γm₀c², seeking assistance with a specific derivation step.
  • Another participant provides a derivation involving p²=γ²m²v² and manipulates it to show the relationship to E², referencing Einstein's formula.
  • A third participant introduces rapidity and its relationship to momentum and energy, presenting an alternative derivation using hyperbolic functions.
  • Some participants discuss the appropriateness of teaching hyperbolic functions and special relativity in high school, with differing opinions on the educational level required.
  • A participant questions a specific step in the derivation of p² and receives clarification on multiplying by c² to resolve their confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches to the derivation, with no consensus on a single method or educational perspective. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best teaching practices for these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the derivation steps and the use of specific mathematical techniques, indicating a reliance on definitions and assumptions that may not be universally agreed upon.

misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
In deriving the relation [tex]E^2=(pc)^2+(mc^2)^2[/tex], I have used the relations [tex]p=\gamma mu[/tex] and [tex]E=\gamma m_0c^2[/tex]. I am currently stuck until a certain step and would appreciate it if someone could show its derivation, thanks a lot...

: )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay,here goes:

[tex]p^{2}=\gamma^{2}m^{2}v^{2}=\frac{c^{2}m^{2}v^{2}}{c^{2}-v^{2}}[/tex]

Add what u need,but only after multiplying by [itex]c^{2}[/itex]:

[tex]p^{2}c^{2}+m^{2}c^{4}=m^{2}c^{4}(\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}-v^{2}}+1)=<br /> m^{2}c^{4}\frac{c^{2}}{c^{2}-v^{2}}=(\gamma m c^{2})^{2}=E^{2}[/tex]

,where i made use of Einstein's formula...

Daniel.



[tex]p[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jamalkoiyess
Just to encourage more use of the rapidity [tex]\theta[/tex] (and one's trigonometric intuition):

[tex]u=c\tanh\theta[/tex] and [tex]\gamma=\cosh\theta[/tex] (So, [tex]\gamma u=c\sinh\theta[/tex])

So, start with [tex]p=m_0c\sinh\theta[/tex] and [tex]E=m_0c^2\cosh\theta[/tex].

Since [tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \cosh^2\theta - \sinh^2\theta&\equiv1\\<br /> \left(\frac{E}{m_0 c^2}\right)^2 - \left( \frac{p}{m_0c}\right)^2&=1\\<br /> E^2 - (pc)^2&=(m_0c^2)^2\\<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]
 
Though not taught in HS,your method is elegant.:smile:Mine is simply lacking in inspiration.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Though not taught in HS

IMHO, there is no reason why hyperbolic trig functions should not be taught in HS trig (in 1950 we got them in "College Math" which I took Junior year in HS). Nor is there that rapidity should not be taught in intro to relativity for math-enabled students.
 
I didn't mean hyperbolic trig functions,but special relativity & SLT using them...Maybe they're taught somewhere,but i would find that level (of teaching physics) too high...:wink:

Daniel.
 
hey, thanks for the help ! and i'll definitely check out that trig derivation once I've started on hyperbolic functions though...

: )
 
Umm, not to bother you guys but, how does
[tex]p^{2}=\gamma^{2}m^{2}v^{2}=\frac{c^{2}m^{2}v^{2}}{ c^{2}-v^{2}}[/tex]?
What I get is:

[tex](\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}})^2=\frac{1}{1-v^2/c^2} *m^2v^2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{m^2v^2}{1-v^2/c^2}[/tex]

Now I'm stuck...
 
  • #10
multiply by [tex]\frac{c^2}{c^2}[/tex]
 
  • #11
oo, you now I got it, thanks. Is that what Dexter meant when he said:
"Add what u need,but only after multiplying by [itex]c^2[/itex]:"?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K