Non-abelian Local Gauge Invariance in Field Theories

[samalkhaiat]

These are notes I made when I was studying the subject 20 years ago. They seem fine considering that I was student then. I believe they can be useful for those who are studying Yang-Mills and other related material.

Sam

 

[VantagePoint72]

Thanks, Sam!

 

[andrien]

nice,but looks some tough as it starts with non abelian lie group directly!

 

[samalkhaiat]

These are notes I made when I was studying the subject 20 years ago. They seem fine considering that I was student then. I believe they can be useful for those who are studying Yang-Mills and other related material.

Sam

Some corrections:
The notes were originally made using Math-Type, then converted to LaTex. This caused some problems with the references to equations numbers. I corrected most of them but missed the followings:

1) on page 7, the sentence before Eq(3.20) should say "using Eq(3.1) and Eq(3.19)"
2) on page 9 the sentence after Eq(3.35) should read "Adding Eq(3.34) to Eq(3.35)".
3) on page 10 again you see a reference to Eq(10), this should changed to Eq(3.1).
4) on page 11 reference to Eq(59) is made. The correct equation number is Eq(4.13).
I think that is all. Please do tell me if you find some more of these.

Sam

 

[iisndt]

nice,but looks some tough as it starts with non abelian lie group directly!

but how its start?