What is the significance of Planck Length in understanding the fabric of space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter michojek
  • Start date Start date
michojek
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.

Does that mean that space itself follows this rule?
For example, you can't have an atom 'between' a plank distance..(like a grid where you can only have positions in the intersections of those lines)

So the smallest distance an object can you is a plank a time?

I'm just not sure if I have the right notion of plank length..

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
michojek said:
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.

Does that mean that space itself follows this rule?

Its not a rule, its a theoretical figure, 10^-35 meters, derived from fundamental constants of nature, such as the speed of light, c, Newton's gravitational constant, G, and Plancks constant, h. Some theoretical physicists truly believe its the fundamentally smallest unit of length, others are not so sure.

For example, you can't have an atom 'between' a plank distance..(like a grid where you can only have positions in the intersections of those lines)

Considering that an atom is many order of magnitude larger than the Planck length, as in perhaps 25, then, yes, you cannot have an atom between a Planck distance. However, that does not mean that there may be something, such as quantum "space-time foam," etc. that may do so.

So the smallest distance an object can you is a plank a time
?

I'm not sure what that sentence is supposed to mean, but there is indeed a Planck time, which has been derived similarly to the Planck length, and that figure is 10^-43 seconds.
 
michojek said:
Hello, I was just reading upon plank's constant and it was theoretically the 'smallest measurement' possible.
You mean the Planck Length. Planck's constant is something else entirely.

The Planck Length, √(ħG/c3) is a length scale, not a precise value. It's roughly the distance at which the effects of quantum gravity are expected to become important. There is no implication that it's the "smallest" distance, or that space becomes a discrete lattice at that scale.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
204
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
10K
Back
Top