Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the writing and submission of a mathematics paper, focusing on aspects such as topic selection, novelty assessment, structure, submission venues, and formatting requirements. Participants share their experiences and seek advice on navigating the publication process in mathematics.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question the novelty of the proposed topics, suggesting that familiarity with existing literature is crucial for determining if the ideas have been previously addressed.
- One participant expresses a long-term goal of finding analytical solutions for the area of overlap between two triangles and for self-intersecting quadrilaterals, believing these topics have not been analytically tackled.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of guidance from experts in the field of analytical overlap geometry, with suggestions to conduct thorough literature searches to identify relevant work and experts.
- Participants discuss the importance of understanding journal-specific requirements for structure and format before submission, emphasizing that each journal has unique guidelines.
- One participant lists several potential journals for submission and seeks feedback on their relevance, while another stresses the importance of reading existing literature to inform submission choices.
- Technical discussions arise regarding the implementation of mathematical functions and algorithms related to the area of overlap between triangles.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the necessity of prior knowledge of existing literature and the feasibility of publishing original work without expert guidance. There is no consensus on the best approach to ascertain the novelty of the proposed ideas or on the suitability of specific journals for submission.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the potential lack of familiarity with the existing body of knowledge in the field, which may affect the assessment of novelty. The discussion also highlights the dependence on specific journal requirements and the challenges of finding experts in niche areas of mathematics.