How to determine the allowable delta max for a beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter CWIL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Delta Max
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The allowable delta max for a beam, particularly when modeling bending forces on square tubing, is critical for ensuring structural integrity. A common rule of thumb is to allow 1 inch of deflection for every 250 inches of beam length, though this varies based on design codes and specific applications. For cantilevered beams, shear and bending must be considered at the point of fixity, as this is where critical stress occurs. A safety factor greater than 1 is essential, with typical deflection limits around 1% for everyday loads to address both structural safety and user comfort.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam deflection principles
  • Familiarity with shear and bending stress calculations
  • Knowledge of structural design codes and safety factors
  • Experience with closed section versus open section analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific design codes applicable to beam deflection limits
  • Learn advanced shear stress calculation techniques for closed sections
  • Explore the implications of safety factors in structural design
  • Investigate user comfort factors in structural applications, particularly in public spaces
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineers, and designers involved in beam design and analysis, particularly those working with cantilevered structures and load-bearing applications.

CWIL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am struggling to remember how to determine the allowable delta max for a beam.

I am currently modeling the bending forces upon a piece of square tubing, and though developing delta max seems rather straight forward, I can not seem to remeber how to determine just how much deflection I am allowed in that beam.

Essentially... I have my delta max, but how do I know if that much deflection is OK in my design (failure due to Plastic Deformation)

Any input is appreciated

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have seen on another PF thread that 1" of deflection per every 250" of beam is an accepted approach. Is this accurate? What is the basis behind this estimation?

Thanks
 
Depending on the design code being used, there are several different rules of thumb like you cited in Post #2. However, most of these are for beams which are supported at both ends.

In order to check how much max. deflection is allowed before failure (which I don't recommend, since you should always have a factor of safety > 1) using tubing which is cantilevered, I think you must consider shear and bending at the point of fixity, since this is probably the most critical location in the entire beam. The bending is pretty straightforward, but shear stress calculation for closed sections is a little more complicated than for open sections.
 
As noted, codes may have deflection limits for a number of reasons, but I have often designed 100 foot long closed tapered multiple sided tubes with a whopping 10 foot deflection at the free end at max yield stress at the fixed end. But bear in mind that this is with a safety factor of about 2.5 for the max design load case (snow or ice and high winds ), so actual deflections for that case would be about four feet or so, for a design condition that is infrequent and of short duration. Actual everyday load without wind and ice might only be about 1 foot or so. I use a deflection limit of about 1 percent or so for that 'everyday ' typical load case.
 
Based on the application, you would have either a maximum permitted stress or a maximum permitted deflection.

People, for example, do not like walking on a platform that deflects too much, from psychological factor coming into play, even though the platform would be design safe from failure due to stress..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K