Surface Area of an N-Dimensional Sphere

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fizixx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the calculation of the surface area of an n-dimensional sphere, exploring theoretical approaches and derivations. Participants express curiosity about the underlying mathematics and seek clarification on the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a previous encounter with the topic in a stat-mechanics class and expresses a desire to understand how to find the surface area of an n-dimensional sphere.
  • Another participant suggests that the surface area is derived from the volume, providing formulas for 3D and proposing similar for 4D spheres, but acknowledges uncertainty.
  • A different participant challenges the previous claim, indicating that the initial response may not be accurate and suggests reading an external article for more information.
  • Some participants express a need for a more detailed explanation of the derivation rather than just references to articles.
  • One participant proposes using inductive reasoning to derive the surface area by differentiating the volume with respect to the radius and integrating the volume of slices.
  • Another participant shares a personal exploration of volume formulas for n-balls and raises a hypothetical question about the volume of a 4-D coffee cup.
  • Questions are raised about the generality of integrating n-1 dimensional objects to find volumes in n-dimensional space, along with curiosity about the behavior of volumes in higher dimensions.
  • A participant shares a formula for the volume of an n-ball in terms of the gamma function and derives the surface area from it, providing explicit formulas.
  • Another participant notes that the gamma function can be substituted with factorials for integer dimensions, referencing additional resources for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation methods and the accuracy of proposed formulas. There is no consensus on a single approach or solution, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate limitations in understanding the derivations and express a desire for clearer explanations. There are unresolved questions regarding the behavior of volumes in higher dimensions and the applicability of integration methods across different shapes.

fizixx
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
This was done while I was in a stat-mech class a long, long time ago...didn't understand it very well at the time. It was an aside kind of thing the prof did, but I'm still curious about this:

How do you find the surface area of an n-dimensional sphere?


Thanks! :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just guessing,
The surface is the derivative of the volume.


In 3D, volume is: [tex]4 \pi r^3[/tex] and surface is: [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi r^2[/tex]

So,
A 4D sphere's surface area will be : [tex]4 \pi r^3[/tex] while its volume will be [tex]16 \pi r^4[/tex]

I think.
 
I was kind of hoping someone could explain the derivation to me. I'm not sure if the link to mathworld is the solution or not. Even if it is I don't understand that any better without some kind of explanation.

I'm 99.999% sure the other response is not going in the right direction, but I appreciate the responses! :biggrin:
 
do it by inductive reasoning. i.e. to get the surface are you just need to differentiate the volume wrt radius. to get the volume you integrate the n-1 volume of a slice.

try to recall how to get the volume ofa 3 sphere by integrating area of circular slices, then apply that one dimension up.
 
fizixx said:
I was kind of hoping someone could explain the derivation to me. I'm not sure if the link to mathworld is the solution or not. Even if it is I don't understand that any better without some kind of explanation.

I'm 99.999% sure the other response is not going in the right direction, but I appreciate the responses! :biggrin:

I think the following website is a good one:

Area and Volume formulas for n-dim spheres and balls

I'll go over the integrals too! :smile:

Edit: Ok I did:

Hey guys, I found the volume formulas for n-balls interesting: simply integrate a cross-section of the object over appropriate bounds. For the ball, it was:

[tex]V_2=2\int_0^{\pi/2} (line)dheight[/tex]

[tex]V_3=2\int_0^{\pi/2} (circle)dheight[/tex]

[tex]V_4=2\int_0^{\pi/2} (sphere)dheight[/tex]

and so on if you check the reference I gave above. I wonder if this is the case in general. That is, if I calculate the volume of my coffee cup then would the volume of a 4-D coffee cup be:

[tex]V_4=\int_a^b \text{(3-D coffee cup)} dp[/tex]

for appropriate values of a, b, and p.

(Hope I don't make it confussing for you Fizixx). :confused:
 
Last edited:
Got some questions:

Can we say in general to calculate the volume of ANY object in n-dimensional space, integrate the n-1 dimensional object over appropriate bounds? What then is the volume of the n-D torus? Same dif? I would say so. Maybe we need to calculate it.

Also, I found it interesting in the MathWorld reference that the volume of the sphere reaches a maximum value at around 5-D and then drops getting closer and closer to zero as the dimension is increased. Is that the case with all n-D volumes? Does this mean that my coffee cup holds smaller and smaller amounts of n-D coffee?

I can see it now: Salty's n-D Coffee Cafe' . . . where the coffee never runs out. :smile:
 
saltydog...and others...

Great in concept, but it does not answer my question, unfortunately. I think I asked my question on the wrong board.

Providing an aswer that tritely says to just integrate your way up the dimension-ladder despite isn't sufficient, but I do apreciate the responses a great deal, and thanks to everyone for sending a response, but I'm closing this thread and going elsewhere for further inquiry. :smile:

Good day all, and hapy thoughts to everyone! o:)
 
fizixx said:
Great in concept, but it does not answer my question, unfortunately. I think I asked my question on the wrong board.

Providing an aswer that tritely says to just integrate your way up the dimension-ladder despite isn't sufficient,
Did you read my link? ( http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Ball.html )


It gives an explicit formula for the hypercontent ('volume') of the n-ball, in terms of the gamma function:

[tex]V_n(r) = \frac{\pi ^{n/2} r^n}{\Gamma \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2}n \right)}[/tex]

From which the 'area' of a hypersphere's surface naturally follows, in the usual way:

[tex]S_n(r) = \frac{ dV_n }{ dr } = \frac{n \pi ^{n/2} r^{n-1}}{\Gamma \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2}n \right)}= \frac{2 \pi ^{n/2} r^{n-1}}{\Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2}n \right)}[/tex]

If you don't like this, there's a table at the bottom of the page which works out the first ten dimensions; and a more complete listing is Sloane's A072478 and A072479 .

edit: More of the same is here (also from Mathworld).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K