0 then Y, else N ? (so cutting ?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kleinwolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cutting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between financial transactions and the concept of love, specifically questioning whether giving money directly to a partner equates to prostitution. Participants argue that true love should not involve direct monetary exchanges, as it complicates the emotional dynamics. The conversation highlights the need for clear definitions and logical connections between financial contributions and emotional fulfillment, emphasizing the importance of understanding the implications of money in romantic relationships.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of emotional economics in relationships
  • Familiarity with the concept of prostitution and its societal implications
  • Knowledge of psychological theories related to happiness and relationships
  • Basic principles of contract theory in interpersonal agreements
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the psychological impact of financial exchanges in romantic relationships
  • Explore the definitions and societal perceptions of prostitution
  • Study emotional economics and its application in personal relationships
  • Investigate contract theory and its relevance to personal agreements
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for psychologists, relationship counselors, sociologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of finance and emotional well-being in romantic partnerships.

kleinwolf
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
Does the following make any sense (after : "Is (physical) love worth something ?") :

If you give in any way money to the other party directly, then we call it prostitution, because the money should be stored in a common way, and hence other systems are not indicating true love ?

(How to control the other puts all his/her money in the common basket ?)

What is then the difference and any meaning of any contract of that type between two people, outside changing the imposition regime ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it doesn't make any sense. How do you jump from exchanging money in any way to prostitution? :confused: You need to work on explaining the steps of how you get from statement A to statement Z, because there seem to be far too many steps missing in your explanations for us to follow anything you ask here.
 
work (difficulty, time) -> money (amount, value)

money (amount, value) -> presents (value) + security (amount)

security (amount) -> biological happiness (less anxiety)
presents (value) -> psychological happiness (feeling special)

bio + psych happiness = happy woman

happy woman = happy man - money (amount, value) + work(difficulty,time)

there he finally done did it.[/size]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K