128 Quantum System D-Wave System on arxiv.org

[MTd2]

http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4321

Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit

R. Harris, J. Johansson, A.J. Berkley, M.W. Johnson, T. Lanting, Siyuan Han, P. Bunyk, E. Ladizinsky, T. Oh, I. Perminov, E. Tolkacheva, S. Uchaikin, E. Chapple, C. Enderud, C. Rich, M. Thom, J. Wang, B. Wilson, G. Rose
(Submitted on 24 Sep 2009)
A novel rf-SQUID flux qubit that is robust against fabrication variations in Josephson junction critical currents and device inductance has been implemented. Measurements of the persistent current and of the tunneling energy between the two lowest lying states, both in the coherent and incoherent regime, are presented. These experimental results are shown to be in agreement with predictions of a quantum mechanical Hamiltonian whose parameters were independently calibrated, thus justifying the identification of this device as a flux qubit. In addition, measurements of the flux and critical current noise spectral densities are presented that indicate that these devices with Nb wiring are comparable to the best Al wiring rf-SQUIDs reported in the literature thusfar, with a $1/f$ flux noise spectral density at $1 $Hz of $1.3^{+0.7}_{-0.5} \mu\Phi_0/\sqrt{\text{Hz}}$. An explicit formula for converting the observed flux noise spectral density into a free induction decay time for a flux qubit biased to its optimal point and operated in the energy eigenbasis is presented.************************

So, what do you think?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-Wave_Systems

 

[f95toli]

About what? The paper contains a lot of information so it is not obvious what you are asking about.
I had a quick look at work today it and it does not appear to be a very "controversial" paper. D-Wave might not have a great track record when it comes to how they handle business and PR, but the stuff they publish in peer-reviewed journals is usually pretty good.

But thanks for linking to it, I did learn something interesting froom it (albeit not from the paper itself).

 

[MTd2]

I am sorry. Given the skepticim, I meant that, is this D Wave company a crank scheme?

 

[f95toli]

No, it is a legitimate company that has been around for quite a while (something like 10 years). They employ several good scientists, have well-equipped labs and have done quite a bit of good work in the past.
But the problem is of course is that they are trying to make money in a very new field and in order to keep their investors happy they tend to promise way too much.

They have somewhat of a bad reputation among universities but that is mainly related to how they do business and has nothing to do with the science as such (note that I am NOT implying that they have done anything illegal, there are plenty of ways to upset people without breaking laws).