1st order, nonhomogeneous, linear DE - particular solution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a particular solution to a first-order, nonhomogeneous linear differential equation of the form \( u_t = rx_t + \dot{u}_t \), where \( x_t \) is a time-varying function and \( r \) is a constant. Participants explore various methods for solving this equation, including the method of undetermined coefficients and variation of parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about differential equations and seeks a straightforward method to find a particular solution, questioning the applicability of the method of undetermined coefficients.
  • Another participant suggests using variation of parameters and mentions that an integrating factor could simplify the process, indicating that the integrating factor \( e^{-t} \) would lead to a particular solution involving an indefinite integral of \( x_t \).
  • A different participant corrects an earlier claim about the general solution form, clarifying that the correct general solution to the equation is \( \bar{u}(t) + \alpha e^t \) rather than the initially proposed form.
  • Further elaboration on the use of variation of parameters is provided, detailing how to express the solution in terms of \( v(t)e^t \) and deriving the relationship between \( v' \) and \( x(t) \) to find \( u(t) \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present differing views on the methods applicable to the problem, with no consensus reached on a single approach. There is acknowledgment of the complexity involved in finding a particular solution, and participants provide various methods without agreeing on one definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note assumptions about the behavior of \( x_t \) and the nature of the functions involved, but these assumptions are not universally accepted or detailed, leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

economicsnerd
Messages
268
Reaction score
24
I know nothing about DEs, so this may be a silly question.

I'm given some time varying [itex](x_t)_t[/itex] and a constant [itex]r[/itex], and I want to solve the equation [itex]u_t = rx_t + \dot u_t[/itex] for [itex]u[/itex].

What I know so far is that (solving the homogeneous equation) if [itex]\bar u[/itex] is some particular solution, then any [itex]u[/itex] is a solution iff it takes the form [itex]u_t=\bar u_t + \alpha e^{rt}[/itex] for some constant [itex]\alpha[/itex].

I'm wondering whether there's a brute force way of finding some [itex]\bar u[/itex]. Anywhere I've looked suggests the "method of undetermined coefficients", but I know it's not useful in my setting. Is there a formula I can blindly apply to get a particular solution? I'm happy to assume [itex]x[/itex] as well behaved as needed, and I'm happy to have my formula be some horrible definite integral I can't compute.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general method for finding particular solutions is called variation of parameters, though in this case, we can use an integrating factor to save quite a bit of work. Note that

$$ e^t \frac{d}{dt} \left( e^{-t} u\right) = \dot{u} - u,$$

so that the integrating factor ##e^{-t}## will lead to a particular solution in the form of an indefinite integral involving ##x_t##.
 
economicsnerd said:
I know nothing about DEs, so this may be a silly question.

I'm given some time varying [itex](x_t)_t[/itex] and a constant [itex]r[/itex], and I want to solve the equation [itex]u_t = rx_t + \dot u_t[/itex] for [itex]u[/itex].
So the subscript t just means that u and x are functions of t?

What I know so far is that (solving the homogeneous equation) if [itex]\bar u[/itex] is some particular solution, then any [itex]u[/itex] is a solution iff it takes the form [itex]u_t=\bar u_t + \alpha e^{rt}[/itex] for some constant [itex]\alpha[/itex].
No. That would be the case if the "r" were multiplying [itex]u_t[/itex], not x. The general solution to the equation [itex]u'(t)+ rx(t)= u(t)[/itex] is [itex]\bar u(t)+ \alpha e^t[/itex].

I'm wondering whether there's a brute force way of finding some [itex]\bar u[/itex]. Anywhere I've looked suggests the "method of undetermined coefficients", but I know it's not useful in my setting. Is there a formula I can blindly apply to get a particular solution? I'm happy to assume [itex]x[/itex] as well behaved as needed, and I'm happy to have my formula be some horrible definite integral I can't compute.
I'm not sure you would call it "brute force" but I would use "variation of parameters". Knowing that [itex]u(t)= Ce^t[/itex], for C any constant, satisfies [itex]u'- u= 0[/itex], to solve the problem [itex]u'- u= -rx(t)[/itex], look for a solution of the form [itex]u(t)= v(t)e^t[/itex]. Then [itex]u'(t)= v'(t)e^t+ ve^t[/itex]. so [itex]u'- u= v'e^t+ ve^t- ve^t= v'e^t= -rx[/itex] then [itex]v'= -re^{-t}x(t)[/itex]. Then [itex]v(t)= -r\int_0^t e^{-\tau}x(\tau)d\tau+ C[/itex] so that
[tex]u(t)= -re^t\int_0^t e^{-\tau}x(\tau)d\tau+ Ce^t[/tex]
 
Whoops, I'd meant to write [itex]ru_t = rx_t + \dot u_t[/itex], but anyway...

Thank you very much, folks! You have been extremely helpful. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K