Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am doing some physics and I end up with this PDE:

[tex] \frac{\partial q(x,y,t)}{\partial t} = -(x^2 + y^2)q(x,y,t) + ax\frac{\partial q(x,y,t)}{\partial y}[/tex]

where q(x,y,t) is the scalar field to determine and a is a parameter. I need to consider two types of initial conditions: q(x,y,t=0) = 1; and q(x,y,t=0) = delta(x,y).

I have found two tentative solutions:

[tex] q(x,y,t) = C\exp \left(-\lambda s + \frac{y}{ax}(x^2 + y^2/3 - \lambda) \right) [/tex]

where lambda is any (?) number. Another solution is

[tex] q(x,y,t) = C\exp \left(-sx^2 + -y^3/3ax\right) [/tex]

They both seem to satisfy the PDE, but I can't make them satisfy the required initial condition (either 1 or delta function). Any ideas or experience with this kind of equations?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# 1st order PDE, seems easy but still confusing

Loading...

Similar Threads - order seems easy | Date |
---|---|

I A common 2nd order ODE from dynamics but... | Feb 28, 2018 |

A Solve a non-linear ODE of third order | Feb 20, 2018 |

A Numerical solution techniques for 6th order PDE's | Feb 3, 2018 |

A Numerical solution for a two dimensional 3rd order nonlinear diff. eq. | Jan 17, 2018 |

Why doesn't the integrating factor e to an integral seem to use a constant of integra | Jan 31, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**