A 2nd Quantization states

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter MaestroBach
  • Start date Start date
MaestroBach
Messages
53
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
I'm currently reading a textbook that is introducing second quantization, and it is using the pariser parr pople model as an example. I realized I was confused on what form the states of such a model would take.
As a heads up, I'm really sorry but I can never get latex to work when I hit preview on physicsforums for some reason. Haven't been able to figure it out across multiple browsers.

So for a bit of context, this question is for the pariser parr pople model applied to something such as a benzene ring, with one orbital per carbon atom. Towards the end of this section, the textbook says the following:

1746815730492.webp


Where n_s gives the number of electrons at site s, and Z_s is the effective nuclear positive charge of atom s.


If the ground state isn't an eigenstate of H, ie h_ss' =/= 0, what |Psi_0> look like? My intuition tells me that seeing as the electron won't be soley localized to each atom, there'd be some kind of superposition where the electron at s = 1 could also be at s = 2 or s = N (and soforth for all the other electrons) but I wasn't quite sure. The textbook has unfortunately been very scant with examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yup, it should most likely be a superposition of the eigenstates of ##\widehat{n}_s##. If the Hamiltonian contains interaction terms such that its matrix is non-diagonal, then after the diagonalization its appropriate eigenvectors (in particular, the ground state with the lowest energy) will be given by linear combinations of the basis vectors which labeled the rows and columns of this original non-diagonal Hamiltonian matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory and MaestroBach
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top