Question about one electron hydrogen atom angular moment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the angular momentum of a one-electron hydrogen atom, particularly in the context of different reference frames and the implications of quantization of angular momentum components. Participants explore the relationships between quantum numbers, the Schrödinger equation, and the effects of rotating reference systems on the eigenstates of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the quantization of angular momentum components, specifically questioning how angular momentum states change when transitioning between different reference frames (S and S').
  • Another participant clarifies that the eigenstates in the rotated frame (S') are linear combinations of those in the original frame (S) and relate to the representation of the rotation group.
  • A different participant challenges the assertion that Lx and Ly are not quantized, explaining that while Lz can be diagonalized, Lx and Ly can also be quantized but will not be diagonal in that basis. They mention the existence of Wigner D-matrices for basis transformations.
  • One participant reiterates the original question and emphasizes that the choice of axis (z or x) does not limit the possible states of the hydrogen atom, as all states can be expressed in terms of any chosen basis.
  • Another point raised is that the expected values of Lx, Ly, and Lz are not quantized and can take on a range of values, which adds to the complexity of the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of angular momentum quantization in different reference frames, and multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of quantization and the representation of states.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the hydrogen atom's energy depends only on the principal quantum number n, which is a special case compared to other systems where energy may depend on additional quantum numbers like l. This distinction is acknowledged but not resolved in the context of the discussion.

Rafael
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble understanding angular moment of the one electron hydrogen atom.

Solving Schrödinger equation on a referece system (say S) I get the energy eigenstates. They depend on three quantum numbers, n, l, m

\frac{-ħ}{2 m}\nabla^{2} \Psi - \frac{e^{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon r} \Psi = E\Psi → \Psi_{nlm}

n measures energy, l measures L2 and m measures Lz.

L_z = mħ
L^{2} = l(l+1)ħ^{2}

From what I understand, Lz is quantized, but Lx and Ly not. So if the electron is in state Ψnml or whatever superposition of the energy eigenstates, it has Lz quantized.

This is when my question arises, if I use another referece system (say S') which is rotated with respect S, and I solve Schrödinger equation again, I get another set of energy eigenstates Ψn'm'l'which have Lz' quantized. But this is nosense because I can choose that the axis z' to be the old axis x, which have not Lx quantized.

What I am missing?
How does the two solutions (on S and S') compare?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the set S' are linear combinations of the S and visa versa. They form a ##2l+1## dimensional representation of the rotation group.
 
Rafael said:
From what I understand, Lz is quantized, but Lx and Ly not.

This is not true, those operators are also quantized. However, if you choose a basis where the Lz operator is diagonal, the Lx and Ly will not be diagonal. Their eigenvalues are discrete, but the Lz eigenstates are superpositions of Lx/Ly eigenstates. Also, note that the different Lz states which share the same L^2 eigenvalue are all degenerate, and similarly, these non-diagonal Lx and Ly states will also be degenerate. You can always switch to a basis where these other states are diagonal (and then Lz will not be diagonal).

Rafael said:
How does the two solutions (on S and S') compare?

What you are looking for are the Wigner D-matrices: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_D-matrix. This rotates the basis between different choices of which direction is diagonal.

One last comment:
Rafael said:
n measures energy, l measures L2 and m measures Lz.
I want to mention that in a general problem with conserved angular momentum, the energy depends on both n and l, which also results in less degeneracy (but all states with the same l would still have the same energy). The Hydrogen atom is special in that the energy doesn't depend on l (this is related to some extra symmetry for 1/r potentials which is not present in general).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rafael and Spinnor
Rafael said:
Hi, I'm having trouble understanding angular moment of the one electron hydrogen atom.

Solving Schrödinger equation on a referece system (say S) I get the energy eigenstates. They depend on three quantum numbers, n, l, m

\frac{-ħ}{2 m}\nabla^{2} \Psi - \frac{e^{2}}{4 \pi \epsilon r} \Psi = E\Psi → \Psi_{nlm}

n measures energy, l measures L2 and m measures Lz.

L_z = mħ
L^{2} = l(l+1)ħ^{2}

From what I understand, Lz is quantized, but Lx and Ly not. So if the electron is in state Ψnml or whatever superposition of the energy eigenstates, it has Lz quantized.

This is when my question arises, if I use another referece system (say S') which is rotated with respect S, and I solve Schrödinger equation again, I get another set of energy eigenstates Ψn'm'l'which have Lz' quantized. But this is nosense because I can choose that the axis z' to be the old axis x, which have not Lx quantized.

What I am missing?
How does the two solutions (on S and S') compare?

Note that these z-based eigenstates simply form a complete basis for all possible solutions. There is actually nothing special about the chosen z-axis. If you choose the x-axis instead of the z-axis, then you'd get a rotated set of basis eigenstates. And, any state of the hydrogen atom could be described as a combination of your ##\psi_{nlm}## states (using the z-axis) or your ##\psi'_{nlm}## states (using the x-axis).

These eigenstates do not represent "the only states that the hydrogen atom can have" - that would be a misinterpretation. Choosing the z-axis simply gives you a particular basis with which to describe all possible states.

Note also that the expected value of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## is not quantized. For a given state the expected value can be anything between ##\pm \frac{\hbar}{2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rafael and Spinnor

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K