News 3,000+ year old sword found in Bavaria, Germany

  • Thread starter Thread starter DennisN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Germany
AI Thread Summary
A late 14th century BC sword has been discovered in Bavaria, Germany, marking a significant archaeological find. The sword is noted for its remarkable condition, which is rare for artifacts of this age. Additionally, the discovery includes at least two bronze arrowheads found in proximity to the sword, suggesting a context of warfare or hunting. The green patina observed on the sword indicates it is made of bronze, further highlighting the historical significance of the find.
DennisN
Gold Member
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
9,762
A sword from the late 14th century BC has been found in Bavaria, Germany. An amazing and rare find. And it seems to be in quite good condition.

Article:

Archaeologists find 3,000-year-old sword (News In Germany)

Photo:

ein-mehr-als-3000-jahre-altes.jpg
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, Astronuc and BillTre
Science news on Phys.org
From the green patina, I suspect that it is a Bronze sword, and there appear to be at least two bronze arrow heads in the soil to the left of the sword.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, BillTre and DennisN

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

History British Isles - a piece of visual history
Replies
23
Views
3K
Homo Sapiens in southern Europe, ~44-46K years ago?
Replies
2
Views
2K
300 Silver Coins of Danish, Arab and Germanic origin found
Replies
2
Views
2K
Viking Women on the battle field?
Replies
5
Views
5K
Rare gold coin from 1420s discovered in Newfoundland, Canada
Replies
2
Views
2K
Henry III gold penny found in Devon, UK
Replies
6
Views
1K
Long-lost star catalogue of the astronomer Hipparchus
Replies
4
Views
1K
Oldest european town found in Bulgaria
Replies
2
Views
8K
5000-Year Old Underground City in Nevşehir, Turkey
Replies
2
Views
3K
History Rutland Mosaic, Roman history in UK
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top