$300 for a gold medal and no monetary compensation

  • Thread starter Thread starter GCT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the participation of professional athletes in the Olympics, particularly in soccer, and the perceived value of Olympic medals compared to other competitions like the World Cup. Participants explore the financial implications for athletes, the age restrictions in Olympic soccer, and the overall significance of the Olympics in various sports.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that many star soccer players are absent from the Olympics due to age restrictions, as Olympic soccer teams are primarily composed of U-23 players with only a few over-age players allowed.
  • Others argue that the financial stakes of professional contracts discourage athletes from participating in the Olympics, viewing it as a risk to their careers.
  • A few participants suggest that the Olympics may not represent national pride as much as it is a commercial venture, questioning the relevance of listing athletes by country.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of amateurism in the Olympics, with some preferring the idea of amateur competitions over professional ones.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of athletes, particularly in sports like soccer, where injuries can be severe, while others note that injuries in basketball seem less dramatic.
  • Some participants highlight that the World Cup is considered a more prestigious event than the Olympics for soccer, leading to a debate about the inclusion of sports with existing major championships in the Olympic Games.
  • There are comments on the financial pressures faced by athletes, with specific mention of China's approach to gymnastics coaching and injury prevention.
  • One participant emphasizes the skill involved in soccer, while another humorously critiques the acting skills displayed by players during matches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the significance of the Olympics versus other competitions, particularly the World Cup. There is no consensus on whether the Olympics should include professional athletes or the value of Olympic medals compared to other accolades.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions touch on the historical evolution of the Olympics and the definitions of amateurism, which may vary based on cultural and national contexts. The implications of financial incentives and athlete participation are also noted but remain unresolved.

GCT
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,745
Reaction score
0
$ 300 for a gold medal and no monetary compensation

Something that I find interesting about the olympics is vast amount of stars that are absent ; in particular those that involve European players . Take one example - soccer - I watched the Euro 2008 with gusto , I was never quite the soccer fan , however the tournament was on a unique and a new level of spectacle for me relative to American sports . Spain won however most of their roster are not present on their olympic soccer team . My guess is its because of the money and perhaps they view the olympics as a political charade by the United States in their " scheme to delude " other nations ...




As for the money my impression is that there is no compensation by the IOC nor the individual countries . Even if one places the only thing of monetary value is the medal itself ; around $ 300 dollars for the gold medal .
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Doesn't Russia pay its athletes quite well for getting medals in the Olympics?
 


GCT said:
Take one example - soccer - I watched the Euro 2008 with gusto , I was never quite the soccer fan , however the tournament was on a unique and a new level of spectacle for me relative to American sports . Spain won however most of their roster are not present on their olympic soccer team .
What's with the spaces before commas and periods?

Anyhow, you should do a little research before you write. All countries with teams in the Olympic soccer venue are lacking their stars because the stars are, for the most part, too old to play in this venue. Each Olympic soccer team comprises U-23 players (born on or after August 1, 1984) plus at most three old farts.
 


GCT said:
Something that I find interesting about the olympics is vast amount of stars that are absent ; in particular those that involve European players . Take one example - soccer - I watched the Euro 2008 with gusto , I was never quite the soccer fan , however the tournament was on a unique and a new level of spectacle for me relative to American sports . Spain won however most of their roster are not present on their olympic soccer team . My guess is its because of the money and perhaps they view the olympics as a political charade by the United States in their " scheme to delude " other nations ...

Soccer is not a good example. The rules are set up to limit over 23 year old participation - I think only 3 members of a national team may be over 23 - which means that some countries with more stars are already selected against.

And that is if the stars wanted to play and risk injury anyway.

With $20M - $50M per year salaries on the line and the opportunity for injury it takes a lot of national pride and love of the game to risk it.

Apparently the NBA is on-board putting their players at risk, because they want to expand the global markets.
 


Or their contracts with their clubs don't allow it.
It's the start of the soccer season, how would you feel if your new $50M striker went away for 2weeks to play in a competition for his own personal glory?

But on a personal level why should they? The olympics doesn't represent your country, it's a money making operation that doesn't pay profesional performers to appear.
Listing atheletes by their country makes no more sense than a F1 victory by Kimi Räikkönen in a British car with a German engine being a victory for Finland.
Why not list athletes as part of the Nike or addidas team like in the tour de france?
 


It used to be that professional athletes weren't allowed to compete. Olympics were only for amateur athletes (and then the recognition they could gain certainly would help kick-start a professional career if they chose to do so). Do all sports now allow professional athletes in them, or is it just a few like basketball? Personally, I liked it better as an amateur competition. It just seemed more "wholesome."
 


Soccer at the Olympics probably shouldn't be included because of the World Cup which is out of phase with the 4 year Olympic cycle. The Olympics only qualified 16 teams I think as it is and not all countries put in the effort that they do for World Cup.

Olympic Medals are nice, but World Cup ... that's over the top.
 


It just seemed more "wholesome."
But it was very unfair. Originally it grew out of an English idea of amateur sports for gentlemen who didn't have to work - after all you wouldn't want to be beaten in the weightlifting by some village blacksmith.

Then you have a problem of definition, if you get a job as a high school phys-ed teacher are you no longer an amateur, or if you are in the army? Is it possible to even be an amateur if you are from a communist country and the state pays for all your training and expenses?
 


LowlyPion said:
Apparently the NBA is on-board putting their players at risk, because they want to expand the global markets.

Risk of what? Soccer I can somewhat understand, because you get freak accidents where entire legs just explode, but I can't remember the last time something bad happened in basketball*.*I don't watch basketball or soccer, but whenever I do watch soccer, someone is on the ground crying. When I watch basketball, someone gets pushed on their ***, gets up and starts complaining, but it ends there.
 
  • #10


LowlyPion said:
Soccer at the Olympics probably shouldn't be included
Sports where there is already a major world championship shouldn't be. that's why soccor is age limited, to stop it being a world cup competitor. But really it makes no more sense than having F1 or indy car racing in the olympics.

I don't know what happens to tennis now that it is open to professionals, do the US open/Wimbledon winners turn up?
 
  • #11


mgb_phys said:
I don't know what happens to tennis now that it is open to professionals, do the US open/Wimbledon winners turn up?

You bet. Federer, Nadal, Djokovic are there.
 
  • #12


Speaking of paying the athletes, did you hear what China did? They told the gymnastics coaches that they would be fined if any of the gymnasts were injured before the olympics.
 
  • #13


tribdog said:
Speaking of paying the athletes, did you hear what China did? They told the gymnastics coaches that they would be fined if any of the gymnasts were injured before the olympics.

That's called putting the fear of the Central Committee into them.
 
  • #14


I can chime in here with some expertise about soccer, especially in the Olympics.

If you didn't know, only players under 23 can participate in the Olympics. If you didn't, then it explains why the best players are absent.

Other than that, it has been known that the Olympics isn't a big thing among soccer players.
 
  • #15


ubermensch said:
I can chime in here with some expertise about soccer, especially in the Olympics.

If you didn't know, only players under 23 can participate in the Olympics. If you didn't, then it explains why the best players are absent.

Other than that, it has been known that the Olympics isn't a big thing among soccer players.

You think the Olympics is big?

Riiiiigghhhht.

The World Cup is the biggest sporting event in the world.

Soccer is the best sport, without a doubt. People who associate it with socialism are quite delusional.

American Football is as macho as you can get. If you are 6'9, then you got a chance in the NFL.

In soccer, it's all about skills baby.
Do you read the posts before you start ranting?
 
  • #16


tribdog said:
Do you read the posts before you start ranting?

No. :biggrin:

I'll change the post. Pretty immature of me really.
 
  • #17


Doesn't bother me in the slightest. I was just wondering
 
  • #18


ubermensch said:
In soccer, it's all about skills baby.

Acting skills, maybe.

wZavXabGsuA&feature=related[/youtub...do classes, where people fall over on command
 
  • #19


That's pretty funny stuff.

Still, you have to understand at how much energy and will these guys give in order to play 90 minutes of soccer.

Trust me, it is VERY hard.

Still, even the slightest kick in the leg can give way to a guy screaming his head off.
 
  • #20


WarPhalange said:
Risk of what? Soccer I can somewhat understand, because you get freak accidents where entire legs just explode, but I can't remember the last time something bad happened in basketball*.


*I don't watch basketball or soccer, but whenever I do watch soccer, someone is on the ground crying. When I watch basketball, someone gets pushed on their ***, gets up and starts complaining, but it ends there.

Basketball has plenty of ankle and knee injuries due to the constant change off direction and sometimes awkward landings.

CS
 
  • #21


American Football is as macho as you can get. If you are 6'9, then you got a chance in the NFL.
Is NFL the sport that's like rugby for school girls? :biggrin:
 
  • #22


As some have mentioned here it seems to be mostly about government their payment towards the athletes. How much do players get compensated for winning first in FIFA? Are NBA players compensated for winning championships?

Some have mentioned here the age requirement however this does not explain the absence of some prominent young players in particular countries ; in fact Portugal and Ronaldho are not even enrolled in the soccer olympics.
 
Last edited:
  • #25


GCT said:
in fact Portugal and Ronaldho are not even enrolled in the soccer olympics.
Well, firstly, Cristiano Ronaldo is out with injury at the moment, since he had an operation following the European Championships a couple of months ago. But, even if he were fit, he would not be playing. Why? Because the Olympics are right at the beginning of the coming football season. No manager in their right mind will allow star players out of their pre-season training to go and play in the olympics. Until the Olympics strike up some agreement with FIFA so as managers will have to allow their players out, then it's just not going to happen.
 
  • #26


GCT said:
For four years of training that seems to be minisicule even degrading.

Yeah, but how many people do it for the money? That's something reserved for team sports pretty much.

Also, they need to have an event for Rock Guitar.
 
  • #27


mgb_phys said:
Is NFL the sport that's like rugby for school girls? :biggrin:

350 lb school girls that can run 40 yds in under 5 seconds with full pads and get high fived if they put you out for the season - if you're lucky?

Yeah that would be the sissy Americanized version of the sport.[/Sarcasm]
 
  • #29


Olympic Soccer has always been a joke, this is nothing new. In fact, this is the case with any privatized sport.
 
  • #30


Werg22 said:
Olympic Soccer has always been a joke, this is nothing new. In fact, this is the case with any privatized sport.

Basketball is a bit of an exception because it is usually played indoors in the winter and so it is off time for most of the athletes. For summer sports like baseball what league would abandon their season every 4 years for the Olympics? What do they get out of it? The Olympics are the ones taking in the money - not the clubs or athletes.