MHB 311.1.3.19 find h and k in the system

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.1.3.19}$
find h and k such that the system has, no solution (parallel) ,unique solution (intersection) , many solutions (same line)
$\begin{array}{rrr}
x_1+hx_2&=2&(1)\\
4x_2+8x_2&=k&(2)
\end{array}$

by observation if h=2 then $k=\mathbb{R}, k\ne 8$ for parallel

if $h\ne 2$ then intersection

if $h=2$ and $k=8$ many solutions
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume that you solved the equations:
Multiply the first equation by 4 to get [math]4x_1+ 4hx_2= 8[/math].
Subtract that from the second equation, [math]4x_1+ 8x_2= k[/math] to get [math](8- 4h)x_2= k- 8[/math].

Solve for [math]x_2[/math] by dividing by 8- 4h: [math]x_2= \frac{k- 8}{8- 4h}[/math]. As long as 8- 4h is not 0, which means h is not 2, there is a unique answer. (There are two intersecting lines.)

If h= 2 and k= 8 the equation is [math]0x_2= 0[/math] which is true for all [math]x_2[/math] so there are infinitely many solutions. (There is only one line described by both equations.)

If h= 2 and k is not 8, the equation is [math]0x_2= k- 8[/math] which is NOT true for any [math]x_2[/math]. There is no solution. (There are two parallel lines.)

That is what you have. Well done!
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
969
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top