MHB 311.3.1.1 - Determinants And Cofactor Expansion

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
nmh{898}
311 Determinants And Cofactor Expansion (3.1.1)

a. Compare the determinants using a cofactor expansion across the first row.

b. compute the determinant by a cofactor expansion down the second column.

$$\left|
\begin{array}{rrr}
3&0& 4\\
2&3& 2\\
0&5&-1\\
\end{array}
\right|$$

ok I accually start this class tomorro but thot I would try some basic stuff
already stuck...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: 311.3.1.1

karush said:
a. Compare the determinants using a cofactor expansion across the first row.

b. compute the determinant by a cofactor expansion down the second column.

$$\left|
\begin{array}{rrr}
3&0& 4\\
2&3& 2\\
0&5&-1\\
\end{array}
\right|$$

ok I accually start this class tomorro but thot I would try some basic stuff
already stuck...

(a)

$3\begin{vmatrix}
3 & 2\\
5 & -1
\end{vmatrix} - 0\begin{vmatrix}
2 &2 \\
0 & -1
\end{vmatrix}+4\begin{vmatrix}
2 & 3\\
0& 5
\end{vmatrix} =3(-3-10)-0(-2-0)+4(10-0)=1$

(b)

note $\begin{vmatrix}
3 & 0 & 4\\
2 & 3 & 2\\
0 & 5& -1
\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}
0 & 4 & 3\\
3 & 2 & 2\\
5 & -1 & 0
\end{vmatrix}$

the second determinant is formed by moving the 1st column in the original matrix to the 3rd column. Now use the new 1st column and its cofactors ...

$0\begin{vmatrix}
2 & 2\\
-1 & 0
\end{vmatrix}-3\begin{vmatrix}
4 & 3\\
-1 & 0
\end{vmatrix}+5\begin{vmatrix}
4 &3 \\
2 & 2
\end{vmatrix}=0[0-(-2)]-3[0-(-3)]+5(8-6)=1$

This is a method I learned in undergrad physics that "stuck". There are other methods to do these ... I'm sure someone else well-versed in linear algebra will contribute.
 
Please give threads titles that briefly describe the thread topic. A thread title that is simply a series of digits and periods is not what we consider a good thread title. :)
 
https://dl.orangedox.com/GXEVNm73NxaGC9F7Cy

SSCwt.png
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K