3rd-order Energy Correction Derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the third-order energy correction, E^{(3)}, in time-independent, non-degenerate perturbation theory. The correct expression for E^{(3)} is identified as E^{(3)} = <1|H' - E^{(1)}\mathbb{I}|1> - 2E^{(2)}<0|1>. Key hints emphasize the importance of utilizing the equations for lower-order corrections to derive the third-order term accurately, specifically referencing equations (1) and (2) from the B&J textbook. The discussion highlights common pitfalls in the derivation process and provides a structured approach to resolving them.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time-independent perturbation theory
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian operators and wave functions
  • Knowledge of energy correction terms in quantum mechanics
  • Ability to manipulate inner products in quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of first and second-order energy corrections in perturbation theory
  • Learn about the role of Hamiltonian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of inner products and their significance in quantum state calculations
  • Review problem sets from B&J's textbook to reinforce understanding of perturbation theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on perturbation theory and energy corrections, will benefit from this discussion.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Time-independent, non-degenerate perturbation theory:

- Let |k> represent k-th order wave function correction.
- Let E^{(k)} represent k-th order energy correction
- H' is the perturbed Hamiltonian.

Want the third order energy correction:
E^{(3)} = &lt;1|H&#039; - E^{(1)}|1&gt; - 2E^{(2)}&lt;0|1&gt;

Homework Equations



Equating coefficients of equal powers of the parameter:
H_0|3&gt; + H&#039;|2&gt; = E^{(0)}|3&gt; + E^{(1)}|2&gt; + E^{(2)}|1&gt; + E^{(3)}|0&gt;

The Attempt at a Solution



Tried multiplying <0| on the left like when deriving the first order correction, E^{(1)}.

I get,
E^{(3)} = &lt;0|H&#039; - E^{(1)}|2&gt;

I don't know what I'm missing to proceed... I'm in the same situation with a few other similar problems. I don't see how multiplying by anything else on the left would make sense either.

Hint on what I'm missing? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
did I state my question poorly? :\

This is problem 8.1 from B&J's book.
 
One last bump... haven't gotten anywhere with this.
 
Recently had to solve the same problem, and since no one has commented, I figured I'd leave a hint or two for the next person who comes along.

Hint 1:
The attempted solution in the opening post is the correct way to proceed, except for a term which has been forgotten:
E^{(3)}=&lt;0|H&#039;-E^{(1)}\mathbb{I}|2&gt;-E^{(2)}&lt;0|1&gt;
(0)​
The secret now is to look at the equations of the coefficients for the lower orders
H_0|1&gt;+H&#039;|0&gt;=E^{(0)}|1&gt;+E^{(1)}|0&gt;
(1)​
and
H_0|2&gt;+H&#039;|1&gt;=E^{(0)}|2&gt;+E^{(1)}|1&gt;+E^{(2)}|0&gt;.
(2)​
Using these, the third order energy correction may be expressed in the form
E^{(3)}=&lt;1|H&#039;-E^{(1)}\mathbb{I}|1&gt;-2E^{(2)}\textt{Re}&lt;0|1&gt;.
(3)​

Hint 2:
The "dual equation" to equation (1) may be written as
&lt;1|H_0=E^{(0)}&lt;1|+E^{(1)}&lt;0|-&lt;0|H&#039;.
(4)​

Multiply <1| with equation (2).
Insert (4) in the first term of this and rearrange.
Insert this in (0).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
737
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K