4.2.251 AP Calculus Exam......must be true on the interval 0<x<2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of the function defined by the integral $\displaystyle g'=\int_0^x e^{-t^2}\, dt$ on the interval $0

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the error function $\mathrm{erf(z)}$ is not necessary for solving the problem.
  • There is a claim that the integral function defining $g'$ is not a constant and that $g'$ is positive for $0
  • Some participants assert that both the first derivative $g'$ and the second derivative $g''$ are positive for all $x$, suggesting that $g$ is increasing and concave up.
  • Others question the implications of the positivity of $g'$ and $g''$, asking what this indicates about the behavior of $g$.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about which of the provided options regarding the behavior of $g$ must be true, suggesting that option (e) looks plausible.
  • Another participant emphasizes that a positive derivative indicates that the function is increasing, while a positive second derivative indicates that the function is convex upward.
  • There is a mention that $g$ is bell-shaped, leading to a claim that it is convex down, which contradicts earlier assertions about concavity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the derivatives of $g$. While some agree on the positivity of $g'$ and $g''$, leading to conclusions about $g$ being increasing and concave up, others challenge these conclusions and introduce alternative interpretations, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the interpretation of concavity and the implications of the function's shape, as well as the definitions of increasing and decreasing behavior in the context of the derivatives.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/9527

ok from online computer I got this

$\displaystyle\int_0^x e^{-t^2}=\frac{\sqrt{\pi }}{2}\text{erf}\left(t\right)+C$

not sure what erf(t) means
 
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\mathrm{erf(z)}$$ is so called error function.

But you shouldn't need to know that to be able to solve the problem.
 
ok but isn't this just going to be $y=\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ which is just a horizontal line
 
karush said:
ok but isn't this just going to be $y=\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ which is just a horizontal line

the integral function defining $g’$ is not a constant

the graph of $e^{-t^2}$ is a bell shaped curve, symmetrical to the y-axis and always positive.

for $0<x<2$, $g’ > 0$ (why?)

also, $g’’ > 0$ (why again?)

... what does that say about the behavior of $g$?
 
Karush, you are making this much harder than it should be!

You are given that y&#039;= \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt.

Since e^x is positive for all x certainly both e^{-t^2} and \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt are positive for all x and t. The derivative and second derivative of y are positive for all x. That is all you need.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Karush, you are making this much harder than it should be!

You are given that y&#039;= \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt.

Since e^x is positive for all x certainly both e^{-t^2} and \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt are positive for all x and t. The derivative and second derivative of y are positive for all x. That is all you need.

$g’’ = e^{-x^2} > 0$ for all $x$

$g’ > 0$ for $x > 0$, $g’=0$ at $x=0$

$g’ < 0$ for $x < 0$
 

Attachments

  • C705C30E-80AD-4DE1-AA8B-85B1C0FDD836.jpeg
    C705C30E-80AD-4DE1-AA8B-85B1C0FDD836.jpeg
    63.7 KB · Views: 145
skeeter said:
$g’’ = e^{-x^2} > 0$ for all $x$$g’ > 0$ for $x > 0$, $g’=0$ at $x=0$
$g’ < 0$ for $x < 0$
Let g be a function with first derivative given by
$$\displaystyle g'=\int_0^x e^{-t^2}\, dt$$
Which of the following must be true on the interval $0<x<2$
a. g is increasing, and the graph of g is concave up.
b. g is increasing, and the graph of g is concave down.
c. g is decreasing, and the graph of g is concave up.
d. g is decreasing, and the graph of g is concave
e. g is decreasing, and the graph of g has a point of inflection on $0<x<2$

ok not sure which of options fit (e) looks plausible
 
You are not sure? Haven't you read the responses here?
You are given that $g'(x)= \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt$ and you have been told that this integral is positive for all x. (Because the integrand is positive for all t.) If a function has positive derivative is it increasing or decreasing?

By the "fundamental theorem of Calculus" g&#039;&#039;= e^{-t^2} which is always positive. If a function has positive second derivative is it convex upward or downward?
 
Country Boy said:
You are not sure? Haven't you read the responses here?
You are given that $g'(x)= \int_0^x e^{-t^2}dt$ and you have been told that this integral is positive for all x. (Because the integrand is positive for all t.) If a function has positive derivative is it increasing or decreasing?

By the "fundamental theorem of Calculus" g&#039;&#039;= e^{-t^2} which is always positive. If a function has positive second derivative is it convex upward or downward?
g is bell shaped so it convex down
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K