I 4D d'Alembert Green's function for linearised metric

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the linearized metric of a spherically symmetric body using the energy momentum tensor in harmonic gauge. The Green's function for the d'Alembertian in four dimensions is derived, leading to a general solution that incorporates spherical symmetry. The retarded propagator is identified as g_ret(x^0,r) = δ(x^0-r)/(4πr), which is expressed in a covariant form as g_ret(x^0,r) = Θ(x^0)/(2π) δ(x·x). The solution highlights that while the Green's function is useful, the problem can be addressed with a stationary solution related to the Laplace operator in three dimensions. The conversation emphasizes the availability of these concepts in standard mathematical methods textbooks.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Q. Calculate the linearised metric of a spherically symmetric body ##\epsilon M## at the origin. The energy momentum tensor is ##T_{ab} = \epsilon M \delta(\mathbf{r}) u_a u_b##. In the harmonic (de Donder) gauge ##\square \bar{h}_{ab} = -16\pi G \epsilon^{-1} T_{ab}## (proved in previous exercise) so
\begin{align*}
\partial_m \partial^m \bar{h}_{ab} =
\begin{cases}
-16\pi GM \delta(\mathbf{r}) & a = b = 0 \\
0 & \mathrm{otherwise}
\end{cases}
\end{align*}with ##u^a = (1,\mathbf{0})##. What is the Green's function for Laplace d'Alembert in 4d?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it the Lapacian (Riemannian space) or rather the D'Alembertian (Lorentzian space) you are looking for?
 
Sorry, I mean the d'Alembertian ##\square = \partial_m \partial^m = \partial_0^2 - \nabla^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
And it's with the Minkowski metric, right?

Then the most simple solution goes as follows: We look for a Green's function, defined by
$$(\partial_0^2-\Delta) G(x)=\delta^{(4)}(x). \qquad (*)$$
For ##r^2=\vec{x}^2 \neq (x^0)^2## the right-hand side is 0, and we can use the spherical symmetry to make the Ansatz
$$G(x^0,\vec{x})=g(x^0,r)$$,
where ##r=|\vec{x}|##. Then the equation reads
$$\partial_0^2 g-\frac{1}{r} \partial_r^2 (r g)=0.$$
Thus ##r g## fulfills the 1D wave equation with the general solution
$$r g(x^0,r)=f_1(x^0-r) + f_2(x^0+r)$$
with arbitrary functions ##f_1## and ##f_2##. Now making use of
$$\Delta \frac{1}{r} = -4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x})$$
and plugging in this solution in (*) you get
$$4 \pi [f_1(x^0) + f_2(x^0)]=\delta(x_0),$$
i.e.,
$$f_1(x^0)=\frac{A}{4 \pi} \delta(x^0), \quad f_2(x^0)=\frac{1-A}{4 \pi} \delta(x^0)$$
with an arbitrary constant ##A##. This implies that the most general Green's function for the d'Alembertian is
$$g(x^0,r)=\frac{1}{4 \pi r} [A \delta(x^0-r) + (1-A) \delta(x^0+r)].$$
Now usually you want the retarded propagator, for which ##g(x^0,r)=0## for ##x^0<0##, for which you uniquely get ##A=1##, i.e.,
$$g_{\text{ret}}(x^0,r)=\frac{\delta(x^0-r)}{4 \pi r}.$$
In manifestly covariant form you can express this as
$$g_{\text{ret}}(x^0,r)=\frac{\Theta(x^0)}{2 \pi} \delta(x \cdot x).$$
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, malawi_glenn and ergospherical
That said, it is just the regular Green’s function of the wave equation in three dimensions. It should be available in most textbooks on mathematical methods?

Also note that you don’t need it to solve your problem. It is clear that the problem has a stationary solution that is the Green’s function of the Laplace operator in three dimensions. The general time dependent solution can then be found by adding homogeneous solutions to that solution.
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical and vanhees71
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
912
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K