4D d'Alembert Green's function for linearised metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the linearised metric of a spherically symmetric body using the d'Alembert Green's function in the context of general relativity. It involves theoretical aspects of the harmonic gauge and the application of the d'Alembertian operator in four-dimensional spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant poses a question regarding the Green's function for the d'Alembertian operator in four dimensions, specifically for a spherically symmetric energy momentum tensor.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the discussion pertains to the Laplacian or the d'Alembertian operator.
  • A clarification is provided that the d'Alembertian operator is defined as ##\square = \partial_m \partial^m = \partial_0^2 - \nabla^2##.
  • Further, it is confirmed that the Minkowski metric is being used in the analysis.
  • A proposed solution involves looking for a Green's function defined by an equation that incorporates the delta function, leading to a spherical symmetric Ansatz for the Green's function.
  • The solution is derived, showing that the Green's function can be expressed in terms of delta functions and arbitrary constants, with a focus on obtaining the retarded propagator.
  • It is noted that the derived Green's function resembles the regular Green's function of the wave equation in three dimensions and suggests that it should be found in standard textbooks.
  • Additionally, it is mentioned that the Green's function is not strictly necessary to solve the original problem, as a stationary solution exists that corresponds to the Green's function of the Laplace operator in three dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of the Green's function for solving the problem, with some suggesting it is not required while others focus on its derivation and implications. No consensus is reached regarding the necessity of the Green's function in the context of the original problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the use of the Minkowski metric and the nature of the solutions derived from the d'Alembertian operator. The dependence on specific definitions and the implications of the arbitrary constant in the Green's function are also noted but remain unresolved.

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Q. Calculate the linearised metric of a spherically symmetric body ##\epsilon M## at the origin. The energy momentum tensor is ##T_{ab} = \epsilon M \delta(\mathbf{r}) u_a u_b##. In the harmonic (de Donder) gauge ##\square \bar{h}_{ab} = -16\pi G \epsilon^{-1} T_{ab}## (proved in previous exercise) so
\begin{align*}
\partial_m \partial^m \bar{h}_{ab} =
\begin{cases}
-16\pi GM \delta(\mathbf{r}) & a = b = 0 \\
0 & \mathrm{otherwise}
\end{cases}
\end{align*}with ##u^a = (1,\mathbf{0})##. What is the Green's function for Laplace d'Alembert in 4d?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it the Lapacian (Riemannian space) or rather the D'Alembertian (Lorentzian space) you are looking for?
 
Sorry, I mean the d'Alembertian ##\square = \partial_m \partial^m = \partial_0^2 - \nabla^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
And it's with the Minkowski metric, right?

Then the most simple solution goes as follows: We look for a Green's function, defined by
$$(\partial_0^2-\Delta) G(x)=\delta^{(4)}(x). \qquad (*)$$
For ##r^2=\vec{x}^2 \neq (x^0)^2## the right-hand side is 0, and we can use the spherical symmetry to make the Ansatz
$$G(x^0,\vec{x})=g(x^0,r)$$,
where ##r=|\vec{x}|##. Then the equation reads
$$\partial_0^2 g-\frac{1}{r} \partial_r^2 (r g)=0.$$
Thus ##r g## fulfills the 1D wave equation with the general solution
$$r g(x^0,r)=f_1(x^0-r) + f_2(x^0+r)$$
with arbitrary functions ##f_1## and ##f_2##. Now making use of
$$\Delta \frac{1}{r} = -4 \pi \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x})$$
and plugging in this solution in (*) you get
$$4 \pi [f_1(x^0) + f_2(x^0)]=\delta(x_0),$$
i.e.,
$$f_1(x^0)=\frac{A}{4 \pi} \delta(x^0), \quad f_2(x^0)=\frac{1-A}{4 \pi} \delta(x^0)$$
with an arbitrary constant ##A##. This implies that the most general Green's function for the d'Alembertian is
$$g(x^0,r)=\frac{1}{4 \pi r} [A \delta(x^0-r) + (1-A) \delta(x^0+r)].$$
Now usually you want the retarded propagator, for which ##g(x^0,r)=0## for ##x^0<0##, for which you uniquely get ##A=1##, i.e.,
$$g_{\text{ret}}(x^0,r)=\frac{\delta(x^0-r)}{4 \pi r}.$$
In manifestly covariant form you can express this as
$$g_{\text{ret}}(x^0,r)=\frac{\Theta(x^0)}{2 \pi} \delta(x \cdot x).$$
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, malawi_glenn and ergospherical
That said, it is just the regular Green’s function of the wave equation in three dimensions. It should be available in most textbooks on mathematical methods?

Also note that you don’t need it to solve your problem. It is clear that the problem has a stationary solution that is the Green’s function of the Laplace operator in three dimensions. The general time dependent solution can then be found by adding homogeneous solutions to that solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K