MHB 51 How far will the car travel in 10 sec

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Travel
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
How far will the car travel in $10$ seconds"
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\Delta t&=10,\quad a=2,\quad d_i=0,,\quad v_i=0\\
d_f&=d_i+v_i\Delta t+\frac{1}{2} a \Delta t^2=0+0\cdot 10+\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\cdot 10^2=100 \, m
\end{align*}

or $\displaystyle v=\int{ a\,\mathrm{d}t}=a\,t+C_1 =a\,t$
since the car starts from rest... $\displaystyle x=\int{ v\, dt=\int{ a\,t \,dt} = \dfrac{1}{2}\,a\,t^2 + C_2 $
where $ \, C_2 = 0 \displaystyle x=\frac{1}{2}\cdot 2\cdot 10^2+C_2= 100+0=100 \, m$

ok i am sure there are some typos
but isn't this more complicated than it need to be
I was just looking at some examples and took stabs at it
Mahalo Much

also I not asked for but wanted to try a tikz graph of this if it is correct
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am not clear what your purpose is in posting this. It is true that if a vehicle is moving with acceleration a meters per second per second, with initial velocity $v_i$ meters per second then in t seconds it will have reached velocity $\int a dt= at+ v_1$ meters per second and will have moved distance $\int at+ v_1 dt= \frac{a}{2}t^2+ v_1t$.

Integrating acceleration with respect to time, twice, gives the formula you use first. Then, of course, doing the integrations gives the same thing.
 
not sure looks like 10 years ago
but I am still weak on physics stuff
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top