MHB 51 How far will the car travel in 10 sec

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Travel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance a car will travel in 10 seconds with an acceleration of 2 m/s², starting from rest. Using the formula for distance, the final calculation shows the car travels 100 meters in that time. Participants discuss the complexity of the calculations and the integration of acceleration to derive the distance formula. There is also mention of potential typos and a desire to create a graphical representation of the motion. Overall, the conversation highlights the mathematical approach to solving motion problems in physics.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
How far will the car travel in $10$ seconds"
\begin{align*}\displaystyle
\Delta t&=10,\quad a=2,\quad d_i=0,,\quad v_i=0\\
d_f&=d_i+v_i\Delta t+\frac{1}{2} a \Delta t^2=0+0\cdot 10+\frac{1}{2} \cdot 2\cdot 10^2=100 \, m
\end{align*}

or $\displaystyle v=\int{ a\,\mathrm{d}t}=a\,t+C_1 =a\,t$
since the car starts from rest... $\displaystyle x=\int{ v\, dt=\int{ a\,t \,dt} = \dfrac{1}{2}\,a\,t^2 + C_2 $
where $ \, C_2 = 0 \displaystyle x=\frac{1}{2}\cdot 2\cdot 10^2+C_2= 100+0=100 \, m$

ok i am sure there are some typos
but isn't this more complicated than it need to be
I was just looking at some examples and took stabs at it
Mahalo Much

also I not asked for but wanted to try a tikz graph of this if it is correct
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am not clear what your purpose is in posting this. It is true that if a vehicle is moving with acceleration a meters per second per second, with initial velocity $v_i$ meters per second then in t seconds it will have reached velocity $\int a dt= at+ v_1$ meters per second and will have moved distance $\int at+ v_1 dt= \frac{a}{2}t^2+ v_1t$.

Integrating acceleration with respect to time, twice, gives the formula you use first. Then, of course, doing the integrations gives the same thing.
 
not sure looks like 10 years ago
but I am still weak on physics stuff
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top