MHB 6.6.63 ln(7-x)+ln(1-x)=ln(25-x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation ln(7-x) + ln(1-x) = ln(25-x) is solved by applying logarithmic rules to combine the left side into a single logarithm. This leads to the equation (7-x)(1-x) = 25-x, which is then expanded and rearranged to form a quadratic equation x^2 - 7x - 18 = 0. Factoring this equation yields the solutions x = 9 and x = -2. However, since the logarithmic functions require x to be less than 1, the valid solution is x = -2. Therefore, the exact solution for x is -2.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny\textbf{6.6.63 Kiliani HS}$
Solve for x give exact form
$\ln{(7-x)}+\ln{(1-x)}=\ln{(25-x)}$

$\begin{array}{rrll}
\textsf{log rules} &(7-x)(1-x) &=25-x \\
\textsf{expand} &7-8x+x^2 &=25-x \\
\textsf{set to zero} &x^2-7x-18 &=0 \\
\textsf{factor} &(x-9)(x+2) &=0 \\
\textsf{zero's} &x&=9, \quad -2 \\
x\le -1\quad\therefore &x&=-2
\end{array}$

I hope...
typo's ?
have to very careful:rolleyes:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
there will be $x \lt 1$ not -1 so $x=-2$ will be the answer
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top