MHB 8.aux.27 Simplify the trig expression

AI Thread Summary
The expression $\dfrac{{\cos 2x}}{{\cos x - \sin x}}$ simplifies to $\cos x + \sin x$, provided that $\cos x \neq \sin x$ to avoid division by zero. The simplification involves recognizing that $\cos 2x$ can be expressed as $\cos^2 x - \sin^2 x$, which factors into $(\cos x - \sin x)(\cos x + \sin x)$. The cancellation of $(\cos x - \sin x)$ is valid only when it is not equal to zero. This condition is crucial to ensure the expression remains defined.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{8.aux.27}$
Simplify the expression
$\dfrac{{\cos 2x\ }}{{\cos x-{\sin x\ }\ }}
=\dfrac{{{\cos}^2 x-{{\sin}^2 x\ }\ }}{{\cos x\ }-{\sin x\ }}
=\dfrac{({\cos x}-{\sin x})({\cos x}+{\sin x\ })}{{\cos x}-{\sin x}}
=\cos x +\sin x$

ok spent an hour just to get this and still not sure
suggestions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
it's correct
 
With the proviso that we only use x s.t. [math]cos(x) \neq sin(x)[/math]. Since the reason for this has left the expression we need to state that.

-Dan
 
good point otherwise you get 0/0
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
587
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top