(A+B+C ) ^ (X + Y + Z ) of arbitrary complexity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jebusv20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complexity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the method for breaking down large floating point numbers into integers for easier storage and performing power operations. The user seeks a way to express the operation (a+b)^(c+d) without directly using the power operation, suggesting the use of the Binomial Theorem for simplification. It is established that for multiprecision arithmetic, algorithms such as Karatsuba multiplication and Fast Fourier Transform multiplication are effective for fast calculations. Utilizing a multiprecision library is recommended for handling complex operations efficiently.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Binomial Theorem
  • Familiarity with multiprecision arithmetic
  • Knowledge of algorithms for fast multiplication (e.g., Karatsuba multiplication)
  • Experience with programming for numerical computations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of the Binomial Theorem in programming languages
  • Explore multiprecision libraries such as GMP (GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library)
  • Learn about Fast Fourier Transform multiplication techniques
  • Study algorithms for repeated squaring in multiprecision arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, software developers, and anyone involved in high-precision numerical computations or algorithm development for multiprecision arithmetic.

jebusv20
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question relates mostly to computer sciences (my personal field of expertise),
I am trying to find the method for breaking down large floating point (non integer) numbers into a series of integers (so that they can be stored easily), and completing a power operation over them.

for example

1.23 ^ 4.56 = ((1E0)+(2E-1)+(2E-2))^((4E0)+(5E-1)+(6E-2))

I am aware that a program would be able to store quite large floating point numbers (generally up to 16 places of complexity) but, if I were to try and calculate something to 1 million places of accuracy, I will need the above break down)

Im sure it has something to do with pascals triangle which I am fairly sure is good for (a+b)^c, but I don't know how to do (a+b)^(c+d). I know this formula exists because I'm sure calculators use it every day... just not sure how to do it myself. To be clear, this formula does not need to be 'easy' to use, a computer can do billions of integer calculations a second, just need to write the code.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No replies? If its a matter of me not explaining myself please just ask what I mean and what confuses you and I'll try to further explain. If its something that would be really hard to explain, just give it a shot... and if you don't know... well ... feel free to tell your friends who might.

Should we just start with the simple stuff? Purely algebraically how could the following be expressed without the power operation, preferably with a serious of multiplication and addition operations:

(a+b)^(c+d)
 
drag12 said:
If you're starting with something like (a+b)^{c+d} just break it into (a+b)^{c}(a+b)^{d} and use the usual http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem for each part of the product, then multiply them together.

This doesn't help for multiprecision arithmetic with more than 2 digits.
If you want to compute (a+b+c)^n, with n an integer repeated squaring and multiplication
is the best way.

a^(2n) = (a^n)^2
a^(2n+1) = a (a^(2n))

A number of algorithms exist to do fast multiplication of multiprecision numbers. (karatsuba multiplication, fast Fourier transfrom multiplication)

The latter will be much faster for large numbers, but also quite hard to implement. Using a multiprecision library is always an option.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K