A balloon lifting a heavy stone

  • Thread starter Thread starter jianghan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Lifting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the physics of a helium-filled balloon lifting a stone. The balloon has a mass of 0.0025 kg and a volume of 0.0045 m³, while the stone weighs 0.015 kg. The net upward force acting on the balloon is calculated to be 0.0206 N, leading to an acceleration of 6.24 m/s² and a time of 0.693 seconds for the balloon to rise 1.5 meters. The participants clarify that the balloon cannot lift the stone indefinitely due to the conservation of momentum and the forces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of buoyancy and density calculations
  • Familiarity with the impulse approximation in physics
  • Ability to perform momentum conservation calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Learn about the impulse-momentum theorem in physics
  • Explore the concept of net forces and acceleration in systems with multiple objects
  • Investigate the effects of air resistance on falling objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of buoyant forces and motion in a gravitational field.

jianghan
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A party balloon(of mass 0.0025kg when empty) is filled with helium to a volume of 0.0045m3. it is tied to a small stone of mass 0.015kg by a light string of length 1.5m to prevent it from flying away. a child holds the balloon at ground level and then releases it.
air=1.20kg/m3 ρHe=0.178kg/m3)

(a)how long does it take for the balloon to rise 1.5m,that is,for the string to become taut?

(b)What is the velocity of the stone when it is lifted off the ground? you may assume the time needed to bring the stone to this velocity is very short(impulse approximation) once the string is taut, and the string remains taut throughout

(c)How long after lifting off will the stone touch the ground again?(neglect air resistance and treat the stone as a particle)

2. The attempt at a solution
part 1 is relatively easy,i have mtotal=0.00330kg,net upward force=0.0206N,a=6.24m/s2, t=0.693s which agrees with the given answer

not really understand part 2 as the net upward force acting on balloon is only 0.0206N,how can it then lift a stone with a weight of 0.147N?

for part 3,if the stone can be lifted,why would it touch the ground again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is the conservation of momentum for the part2, where

m(of balloon)v=m(of balloon and stone)v
v of balloon=at=4.32432, mass of balloon is 0.00330kg (as you calc-ed), mass of balloon+stone=0.0183kg, then you can solve for v.

as for part3, hmm...
 
Did you read the question?

"it is tied to a small stone of mass 0.015kg by a light string of length 1.5m to prevent it from flying away."

If the upward force of the balloon could lift the stone indefinitely, then the stone isn't doing its job.

"(b)What is the velocity of the stone when it is lifted off the ground? you may assume the time needed to bring the stone to this velocity is very short (impulse approximation) once the string is taut, and the string remains taut throughout"

If the balloon is floating and accelerating upward, it is gaining momentum. If the balloon just flies up, makes the string taught, and nothing further moved, that would imply that the momentum disappears. The momentum obviously doesn't disappear, and the question tells you that. It tells you to use the "impulse approximation." Impulse is instantaneous momentum change.

jianghan said:
not really understand part 2 as the net upward force acting on balloon is only 0.0206N,how can it then lift a stone with a weight of 0.147N?

for part 3,if the stone can be lifted,why would it touch the ground again?

Have you ever tried this as a kid? It really does lift the stone.
 
No,maybe the stones i used to tie my balloons to were all too heavy for this effect to be noticeable.

anyway,for part 3,my solution is as follows
maximum momentum=mballoon x at=0.0143 kgm/s
net downward force=0.1264N
time needed to "cancel" the upward momentum=0.0143/0.1264=0.113s
time needed to touch the ground again(achive the same downward momentum)=0.113x2=0.226s

is my method correct?
 
Your method for part 3 is correct. However, your method for part 1 is incorrect, which led to an incorrect answer. Next time, try to do the problem with variables as opposed to numbers. It looks cleaner, and it's easier to identify where you went wrong.

In the setup of the problem, the balloon is tied to a string, which is tied to a stone. If the balloon is at ground level (the string is not taut), then the stone is on the ground, and there is no way for balloon to lift the stone. We assume that the string has no mass, so the only thing accelerating up is the balloon.

The only moving piece is the balloon, so the rock does not contribute to the total momentum of the apparatus. Therefore, the acceleration and time you calculated for part 1 is wrong, because it uses the total mass, not the mass of the balloon.
 
Last edited:
Harrisonized said:
Your method for part 3 is correct. However, your method for part 1 is incorrect, which led to an incorrect answer. Next time, try to do the problem with variables as opposed to numbers. It looks cleaner, and it's easier to identify where you went wrong.

In the setup of the problem, the balloon is tied to a string, which is tied to a stone. If the balloon is at ground level (the string is not taut), then the stone is on the ground, and there is no way for balloon to lift the stone. We assume that the string has no mass, so the only thing accelerating up is the balloon.

The only moving piece is the balloon, so the rock does not contribute to the total momentum of the apparatus. Therefore, the acceleration and time you calculated for part 1 is wrong, because it uses the total mass, not the mass of the balloon.

Actually in my solution for part 1,"total mass" means the combined mass of balloon and helium, i did exclude mass of the stone, that's why my answer agrees with the given answer.
but thank you for your advice though
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K