Is Synchronized Vehicle Acceleration the Solution to Traffic Delays?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of synchronized vehicle acceleration as a potential solution to traffic delays. Participants highlight the importance of advanced communication systems, such as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication and in-road transponder units, to facilitate real-time traffic updates and improve safety. Concerns about trust in automation and driver complacency are also raised, drawing parallels to autopilot systems in aviation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for reliable technology to enhance driving efficiency and safety.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication systems
  • Familiarity with Hardware Abstraction Layers in automotive technology
  • Knowledge of traffic management systems and their components
  • Awareness of autopilot systems in aviation for comparative analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technologies
  • Explore the implementation of in-road transponder systems for traffic management
  • Study the impact of automation on driver behavior and safety
  • Investigate existing models of synchronized vehicle acceleration in urban planning
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, traffic management professionals, urban planners, and anyone interested in the future of transportation technology and traffic efficiency.

G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
 
Phlogistonian said:
I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.

Sounds like your Hardware Abstraction Layer is messed up. I'd suggest you fix it before you reach your destination.
 
50 years from now, that car in the picture will seem to us now just like a 10mb harddrive from the 80s.
 
That would make the commute much more efficient. You could talk on your cell phone, change your CD's, fix your make-up, drink your coffee, all while driving 20 feet behind the person in front of you on the interstate at 75 mph.

Wait, people already do that.

Well, it would make driving safer. What would MADD do?
 
The only problem I have with systems like this, is that I don't think I would ever trust it 100%. In other words, even though it would take over driving for me, I would still have to keep my hands close to the steering wheel and continue to maintain full attention in anticipation of having to make a correction... or an emergency maneuver.

What I'm relating this to is the autopilot and autolanding systems in aircraft. Each pilot that I've spoken with has said that they do not 100% trust the autopilot feature and still maintain full attention when it is engaged. There is apparently even less less confidence with the autolanding feature.
 
How about encoding the road layout in wide infrared paint strips on the road. You car reads the information from the encoded road and knows about the 30 degree curve and stop sign ahead. Add a radar system, and a full mesh car computer to car computer communication and your are done.
 
sirzerp said:
How about encoding the road layout in wide infrared paint strips on the road. You car reads the information from the encoded road and knows about the 30 degree curve and stop sign ahead. Add a radar system, and a full mesh car computer to car computer communication and your are done.

Not a bad idea. I wouldn't be surprised if a type of transponder unit was installed at say, 1/2 mile or 1 mile increments along stretches of freeways or highways. The units would then be able communicate with the cars onboard system and could relay information about upcoming traffic jams, accidents, weather conditions or construction. Off the top of my head, the only downside I can see would be the required power for each and every unit along a given stretch... which 'could' eventually add up to a substantial amount. I'm not sure how much power would be needed for a unit like that though.

A passive in-road setup with reactive strips, like you suggested, would be more reliable though.
 
  • #10
B. Elliott said:
The only problem I have with systems like this, is that I don't think I would ever trust it 100%. In other words, even though it would take over driving for me, I would still have to keep my hands close to the steering wheel and continue to maintain full attention in anticipation of having to make a correction... or an emergency maneuver.

Initially, I think that would happen. The problem is, I think over time, people would become more and more comfortable with it and complacent and not pay much attention. Considering there are already nitwits driving off the road while following their GPS/navigation device thingy without paying attention to whether the road it has programmed in is really present, I don't think it would take long before cars on autopilot were driving into lakes when someone programmed a right instead of a left into the directions and the driver wasn't paying any attention.
 
  • #11
Vehicle to vehicle communications always comes to mind when I am fifteen cars back sitting at a red light.

When the light turns green the first car starts off almost immediately, but as the time to step on the gas trickles back through the line of cars the reaction time slows down. By the time I finally step on the gas the light is red again.

I've always thought how great it would be if all of the cars accelerated in sync. All of the dumb bunnies sitting there not paying attention would be moving instantly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
813
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K