Schools A college degree for creating the ultimate problem solving mind

Click For Summary
Mastering physics is often touted as a pathway to developing superior problem-solving skills, leading to the belief that a physics major is the best route for this purpose. However, the validity of this claim is questioned, particularly in comparison to other fields like mathematics and computer science. The discussion highlights that while physics majors may excel in addressing complex, counter-intuitive problems, other disciplines also cultivate strong problem-solving abilities tailored to their specific domains. Engineering is noted for its multifaceted approach to problem-solving, considering various factors like cost and safety. The consensus suggests that a well-rounded education across multiple subjects may be more beneficial for developing comprehensive problem-solving skills rather than focusing solely on physics.
CynicusRex
Gold Member
Messages
98
Reaction score
68
I have frequently read and heard that mastering physics is the ultimate way to mold a problem-solving mind. Therefore, becoming a physics major is supposed to be the best way of doing so. I wonder to what degree that statement holds true.

Is it true? Is it biased? Am I misinterpreting something? Why would it be less true for a mathematics major, or a computer science major? Could it be that physics majors are better problem solvers in general, in all walks of life, whereas other majors specialize in solving problems specific to their field? Suppose it is true, is it because physicists study counter-intuitive phenomena more frequently? I'm interested in seeing other perspectives on this matter.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Engineers are problem solvers. When they design a solution to a problem, they are not just considering the science of the actual device or process. They have to balance cost, performance, environmental, and safety issues.

I think that Physics is not enough, by itself. I would be interested in reading the article, which you mentioned.
 
scottdave said:
I would be interested in reading the article, which you mentioned.

It's not a specific article, but hearsay from a bunch of people like Elon Musk, or Paul Graham from Y Combinator, etc. And they don't state things like "physicists are the ultimate problem solvers," but it always comes down to "if you want to learn how to solve problems better, learn physics."

I started noticing because I haven't heard anyone say "if you want to learn how to solve problems better, learn computer science." Actually, engineers are high on that 'list' as well.

PS I do not want to put any particular field on some kind of pedestal, for that is silly and pointless.
 
That makes more sense, now. I think a well solid base in several of subjects is key to good problem solving skills.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
547
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K