A couple specific Physics problem solving questions

Click For Summary
In a discussion about problem-solving techniques in Physics, participants emphasize the importance of organized work and strategic approaches to solving problems. It is recommended to avoid plugging in numbers too early, advocating for the formulation of equations using only symbols before substituting numerical values at the end. Drawing diagrams is highlighted as a crucial step, particularly for mechanics problems. Participants also stress the significance of checking unit balance in equations and maintaining an estimate of the answer's magnitude to avoid errors, especially in fields like astronomy or chemistry. Additionally, engaging creatively with the problem is encouraged, such as analyzing how changes in variables affect outcomes and ensuring that results align with established knowledge. This reflective practice can help identify mistakes and deepen understanding of the concepts involved.
DrummingAtom
Messages
657
Reaction score
2
I'm in my first ever Physics class and have a few questions concerning skills involving solving Physics problems. I've been noticing that even though I get the right answers, my work getting there is a mess and unorganized. With that said, I have a hunch that won't fly in the upper level classes, which is why I'm trying to figure this out early.

When you're working on a problem do you try to stay away plugging in numbers too early? Like if a problem needs to have several things found to arrive at the final answer, do you make one large equation with only symbols *then* plug in numbers at the very end?

Also, when you get to the end of that a distinct relationship is found among the symbols. Is there anything from a creativity aspect that you do to gain more insight into the problem? I know this question seems a little strange, but I'm pretty new to Physics and want to develop some skills with solving problems as well as some creativity. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few tips.
1, Draw a diagram - especially for any mechanics type problems
2, Don't put in the numbers until you have the equations rearranged/solved.
3, When you have the equations worked out, check that the units balance.
4, Although you shouldn't put in numbers too early you do need to have an estimate of the answer - or at least the magnitude of the answer. This is especialy important for astronomy/chemistry type questions with very large/small numbers. It's easy to be a factor a million out because you got a unit wrong or mistyped a calcuator button
 
DrummingAtom said:
When you're working on a problem do you try to stay away plugging in numbers too early? Like if a problem needs to have several things found to arrive at the final answer, do you make one large equation with only symbols *then* plug in numbers at the very end?
Yes, exactly.
Also, when you get to the end of that a distinct relationship is found among the symbols. Is there anything from a creativity aspect that you do to gain more insight into the problem?
Yes, at this point I check if the behavior of the equation agrees with what I know from common sense (or other knowledge I have). Just for example,
  • As one variable is increased, does the result increase or decrease?
  • As one variable is increased, does the result go through a maximum or minimum?
  • What is the result when one variable is zero?
  • What value of the variable would cause the result to be zero?
  • What is the result when one variable approaches infinity?
  • Do the units on both sides of the equation agree? Do the units of terms that are added or subtracted agree?
If the answers to those questions conflict with how I know things should be, that's a signal that I have made a mistake somewhere.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
816
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K