A Difficult Mechanics Problem (Work-Energy?)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving a swinging ball attached to a string that interacts with a peg. The problem is divided into two parts: determining the distance below the support point for the peg placement and expressing this distance as a function of an angle when the peg is positioned at an angle below the horizontal. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics, specifically work-energy principles and forces in circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss applying the law of conservation of energy to analyze the motion of the ball and its velocity at various points. There are attempts to relate energy and velocity, but some express difficulty in deriving useful relations. Others question the assumptions made regarding forces acting on the ball and the direction of gravitational force. There are also discussions about deriving expressions for distance d based on angles and other parameters.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their attempts at solutions, including derivations and assumptions. There is recognition of the complexity of the problem, with some noting that it requires high-level observations and conditional thinking. While certain expressions for distance d have been proposed, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of these solutions, and multiple interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the challenge of the problem, indicating it may not be suitable for introductory levels. There are references to specific values and variables, but the discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications of these findings.

chaose
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The string is L = 1m long. Peg P is located d below the support point. When the ball is released from rest (as shown), it swings along the dashed path. WHen it catches on the peg, it swings upward but does not complete a circular path. Instead it leaves its path and strikes the peg.
Part A. What is the distance d below the support point at which the peg can be placed for this to occur?
Part B. If the Peg P is now located at an angle A below the horizontal (as in the picture). When the string catches on the peg, the ball strikes the peg. Express d as a function of A if this were to occur.
http://images.snapfish.com/3455%3A%3B9923232%7Ffp64%3Dot%3E235%3A%3D9%3A%3A%3D%3A39%3DXROQDF%3E23242555%3B4677ot1lsi
I'm thinking of approaching it by applying the law of conservation of energy and figuring the energy and velocity at various points, and get a relation in terms of energy. So far, I'm not getting anywhere useful. Can anyone please help (and explain?)
thanks .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I wrote up a solution to the first problem. Click on the thumbnail to see it. I do not claim that my solution is the most efficient one, nor do I even claim that it is correct.
http://img102.imagevenue.com/loc241/th_b9e_Picture_036.jpg
Note: Apparently, I skipped a major step in that solution. Here's the corrected solution:
th_54a_Picture_0361.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Overall it looks good, but if alpha is the angle over the horizontal then shouldn't the total force be: [tex] F = \frac{mv^2}{r} + mgsin(\alpha)[/tex]
 
daniel_i_l said:
Overall it looks good, but if alpha is the angle over the horizontal then shouldn't the total force be: [tex] F = \frac{mv^2}{r} + mgsin(\alpha)[/tex]
Oh, well, if you say that g is negative, then you add, but I just assumed that it's positive. I guess it might be more correct to say that it's negative, because to calculate the angle, I chose a coordinate system with the x-axis going right and the y-axis going up. Since g is directed downward, it should be negative. But obviously this is of no consequence if you say beforehand that g is positive, which I forgot to do.

I also noticed that I misspelled "parabolic" as "parobolic."
 
Last edited:
Quite a nasty "introductory" problem.

This problem required you to make several fairly high-level observations about the situation; as an engineer, it took me a fair amount of effort to prove the assumptions I made.
The attached PDF shows all work, derivations, and assumptions used to reach the final conclusions.
For those of you playing the home-game, here's what I got:
[tex]d = L - L\frac{2}{2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]
(this solution should hold for any length, L)
... If L=1m, then
[tex]d = 1 - \frac{2}{2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex], whatever that comes out to. All I know is that it's less than 1.
By the way, if you're wondering what the ideal angle is offhand, I got
[tex]\tan{\theta} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
The second part was just a matter of doing some quick trig based on the previous part, finding d as a function of beta ([tex]d(\beta)[/tex]). I was able to get beta as a function of r, the secondary swing radius. If you want it as a function of d, then substitute.
[tex]r(\beta) = \frac{L \sin{\beta}}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}+\cos{\beta}}[/tex]
I know it seems very complicated, but I left a lot of the numbers there as radical constants as opposed to evaluating / approximating them. I hope this helps, because it made my brain hurt.

- vtMeMo

P.S., THIS IS NOT AN INTRODUCTORY PROBLEM. Professional Engineers called this problem "mean" for even an advanced student, just by virtue of how much conditional thinking it requires. It took me almost 2.5 hours to go through it by hand (checking).
 

Attachments

vtmemo said:
For those of you playing the home-game, here's what I got:
[tex]d = L - L\frac{2}{2+\sqrt{3}}[/tex]
Thats exactly what I got. It actually wasn't that hard if you use energy conservation to get the speed as a function of the angle and L, centripetal force to get another speed-angle equation (the tension is 0 when the mass starts to fly to the middle) and the kinimatics equations to get an equation connecting the radius of the small circle and the speed. With those 3 equations it just takes algebra to find d as a function of L.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K