A googolplex expressed in factorial form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saracen Rue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial Form
Saracen Rue
Messages
150
Reaction score
10
Does anybody know what the factorial form of a googolplex would be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So you're asking to calculate the inverse gamma function, since the gamma function and the factorial are closely related. i.e. you want to solve for n in
n!=10^{10^{100}}

I can give you a quick start on the approximate magnitude of n. Since a crude approximation is n!\approx n^n, then choosing n=10^{100} gives us
n^n=\left(10^{100}\right)^{\left(10^{100}\right)}=10^{100\times 10^{100}}=10^{10^{102}}\approx 10^{10^{100}}

hence n is somewhere in the ballpark of a googol.

Unless of course, you meant something else by your OP. Maybe you were asking what 10^{10^{100}}! is?
 
Mentallic said:
So you're asking to calculate the inverse gamma function, since the gamma function and the factorial are closely related. i.e. you want to solve for n in
n!=10^{10^{100}}

I can give you a quick start on the approximate magnitude of n. Since a crude approximation is n!\approx n^n, then choosing n=10^{100} gives us
n^n=\left(10^{100}\right)^{\left(10^{100}\right)}=10^{100\times 10^{100}}=10^{10^{102}}\approx 10^{10^{100}}

hence n is somewhere in the ballpark of a googol.

Unless of course, you meant something else by your OP. Maybe you were asking what 10^{10^{100}}! is?

Yes I was asking what 'n' would have been, and thank you for helping.
 
I tried to get Wolfram Alpha to solve but it exceeded the standard calculation time - maybe someone with a pro account can try it.

Anyway just through guessing I managed to get 102483838377090000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000! (1.0248383837709e+98!) as an answer.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top