A Graph analysis problem to find when the acceleration is zero

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of acceleration being zero at specific points on a graph, particularly point K, which is identified as having maximum slope. Participants clarify that while points E and H show zero acceleration due to their slopes being parallel to the axis, point K also has zero acceleration despite not being constant velocity. It is emphasized that zero acceleration can occur at an instant without implying constant velocity, using the example of a velocity function that changes over time. The conversation also touches on the definition of a point of inflection, where the slope of the graph changes direction. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing motion in physics.
uranium92
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I have attached the question below in the image. It is not a homework but I am solving Introductory Mechanics by Morin.
Relevant Equations
$$v = \frac{dx}{dt}$$
$$a = \frac{dv}{dt}$$
jj.PNG

I had deduced that B,E,H are the places where acceleration will be zero, but when I read the solutions it showed that K also has a = 0. It said it had maximum slope and then said a = 0. But I couldn't understand why? Please help.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
uranium92 said:
It said it had maximum slope
What does the slope represent on the x vs t graph?
 
Looks like K is a point of inflection on the x(t) graph.
 
Think; what sort of behaviour is expected to represent ##a=0## in each graph.

acceleration vs time - not worth mentioning except to note that it's not worth mentioning.

velocity vs time - if there is no (ie:zero) acceleration/deceleration, what does that do to the velocity ? How will that be represented in the graph ? note that I disagree with your assertion that ##E## and ##H## represent zero acceleration

distance vs time - how would the velocity as determined by ##a=0## show up on a ##d:t## graph ? and I agree with the official answer concerning the locus around point ##K## as ##a=0##
 
TSny said:
What does the slope represent on the x vs t graph?
It represents the velocity in a x vs t graph.
 
neilparker62 said:
Looks like K is a point of inflection on the x(t) graph.
I don't know what inflection is. If you could tell me or give some links it would be nice.
 
hmmm27 said:
Think; what sort of behaviour is expected to represent ##a=0## in each graph.

acceleration vs time - not worth mentioning except to note that it's not worth mentioning.

velocity vs time - if there is no (ie:zero) acceleration/deceleration, what does that do to the velocity ? How will that be represented in the graph ? note that I disagree with your assertion that ##E## and ##H## represent zero acceleration

distance vs time - how would the velocity as determined by ##a=0## show up on a ##d:t## graph ? and I agree with the official answer concerning the locus around point ##K## as ##a=0##
I deduced about E and H because the slopes at both points are zero or say parallel to the axis but what I don't understand is how at K acceleration = 0.
 
uranium92 said:
It represents the velocity in a x vs t graph.
Yes. And, as you said, the slope is maximum at point K.

Which point of the v vs t graph best corresponds to point K of the x vs t graph?
 
uranium92 said:
I deduced about E and H because the slopes at both points are zero or say parallel to the axis but what I don't understand is how at K acceleration = 0.
I see your point on the ##v:t## graph, though I still disagree with it : I'd argue that a constant velocity (ie: zero acceleration) is determined by a line not a point, and the lines don't look straight (and level) to me. YMMV.

Regarding ##K##, don't look directly at the point ; look at the segment - what does a straight line in a ##d:t## graph represent in terms of velocity ?
 
  • #10
TSny said:
Yes. And, as you said, the slope is maximum at point K.

Which point of the v vs t graph best corresponds to point K of the x vs t graph?
Isn't it mentioned in the question that all the graphs are not related to each other?
 
  • #11
uranium92 said:
Isn't it mentioned in the question that all the graphs are not related to each other?
Yes. But I still think my question is relevant.
 
  • #12
hmmm27 said:
I see your point on the ##v:t## graph, though I still disagree with it : I'd argue that a constant velocity (ie: zero acceleration) is determined by a line not a point, and the lines don't look straight (and level) to me. YMMV.

Regarding ##K##, don't look directly at the point ; look at the segment - what does a straight line in a ##d:t## graph represent in terms of velocity ?
Got it. Does it mean the velocity is constant which means zero acceleration?
 
  • #13
uranium92 said:
Got it. Does it mean the velocity is constant which means zero acceleration?
A constant velocity is the definition of zero acceleration.
 
  • #14
hmmm27 said:
A constant velocity is the definition of zero acceleration
Thank you very much for your help.
 
  • #15
hmmm27 said:
A constant velocity is the definition of zero acceleration.

No. You can have zero acceleration at an instant of time even though the velocity is not constant.

For example, consider the case where the velocity as a function of time is given by the simple equation ##v = t^2##. Note that the velocity is always changing with time. There is no interval of time over which the velocity is constant.

For this velocity function the acceleration as a function of time is given by ##a = 2t##.
At ##t = 0## the acceleration is zero even though the velocity is not constant.

So, zero acceleration at some instant of time does not imply constant velocity.

Likewise, at point K of the x vs t graph, the acceleration is zero. We can say that the velocity is maximum at K, but we can't conclude that the velocity is constant near K.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, Lnewqban and uranium92
  • #16
TSny said:
No. You can have zero acceleration at an instant of time even though the velocity is not constant.

For example, consider the case where the velocity as a function of time is given by the simple equation ##v = t^2##. Note that the velocity is always changing with time. There is no interval of time over which the velocity is constant.

For this velocity function the acceleration as a function of time is given by ##a = 2t##.
At ##t = 0## the acceleration is zero even though the velocity is not constant.

So, zero acceleration at some instant of time does not imply constant velocity.

Likewise, at point K of the x vs t graph, the acceleration is zero. We can say that the velocity is maximum at K, but we can't conclude that the velocity is constant near K.
Understood it, Thanks for your help.
 
  • #17
uranium92 said:
I don't know what inflection is. If you could tell me or give some links it would be nice.
A point of inflection of function f(x) occurs when the second derivative is zero - ie f''(x)=0. On the graph of x(t) in your problem, this corresponds to the point where the slope of the graph stops increasing and starts decreasing.
 
  • Like
Likes uranium92
  • #18
neilparker62 said:
A point of inflection of function f(x) occurs when the second derivative is zero - ie f''(x)=0. On the graph of x(t) in your problem, this corresponds to the point where the slope of the graph stops increasing and starts decreasing.
Thanks for explaining.
 
  • #19
TSny said:
No. You can have zero acceleration at an instant of time even though the velocity is not constant.
You are very right here, however i think @hmmm27 was saying that if acceleration is zero at all times then the velocity is constant.
 
Back
Top