A group of finite order can be infinitely large?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jessicaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of groups in abstract algebra, specifically whether a group of finite order can be infinitely large. Participants explore definitions of finite order, cyclic groups, and the implications of repeating elements within groups.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the interpretation of "writing down repeating elements" in the context of groups of finite order.
  • One participant asserts that if a group is of finite order, every member must also have finite order, suggesting that repeating elements would not yield new members.
  • Another participant challenges the assertion that all elements in a finite group must have finite order, citing examples where elements might appear to have infinite order.
  • A participant explains the proof that every element of a finite group has finite order, referencing the pigeonhole principle.
  • Some participants clarify that a group of finite order typically refers to a group with a finite number of elements, which cannot be infinite by definition.
  • One participant proposes that it is possible to have an infinite group where each element has finite order, using the infinite direct product of Z/2 as an example.
  • Another participant illustrates that writing a sequence of repeating elements does not create a larger set, using Z_3 as an example.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of finite order in groups. There is no consensus on whether repeating elements can lead to an infinite group, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of certain examples.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of finite order and the potential for misunderstanding the nature of group elements and their orders. The proof provided relies on specific assumptions about group structure.

jessicaw
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
a group or a cyclic group of finite order can i just repeatedly write down the repeated elements and form a very large even infinite group?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "write down repeating elements". If the group is of finite order, then every member of it has finite order. Eventually, "repeating elements" get you back to the identity and then you get nothing new.
 
HallsofIvy said:
What do you mean by "write down repeating elements". If the group is of finite order, then every member of it has finite order. Eventually, "repeating elements" get you back to the identity and then you get nothing new.

why" If the group is of finite order, then every member of it has finite order."? The group may not be a cyclic group. For example {1,2,3} the group is finite the member may have infinite order like the element {2}?

"get you back to the identity and then you get nothing new." is what i am confused; i am always wondering if i can write a group called {1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1....}. Please help. Thanks
 
What do you mean by the group {1, 2, 3}? Surely not the group with three members since that is a cyclic group.

In any case, the proof that every element of a finite group has finite order is elementary. I would be surprised if you didn't see it shortly after learning the definition of "order".

Let a be any member of the finite group, G. Then, for all n, [itex]a^n\in G[/itex]. Since there are only a finite number of members of G while there are an infinite number of positive integers, by the pigeon hole principal, we must have [itex]a^k= a^j[/itex] for some distinct j and k. If j< k, then [itex]a^ka^{-j}= a^{k- j}= a^ja^{-j}= e[/itex] where e is the group identity and I am using "[itex]a^{-j}[/itex] to represent the inverse of [itex]a^j[/itex]. If k< j, then [itex]a^ka^{-k}= e= a^{j}a^{-k}= a^{j-k}[/itex].

In either case, a has finite order.
 
Usually what is meant by a group of finite order is a group with finitely many elements so by definition it can not be infinite.

But if you just require that each element be of finite order then one can have an infinite group with no problem

take the infinite direct product of Z/2 with itself.
 
I think the OP had in mind something like, for example, with Z_3, writing {1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,...}. And the answer is, no, that is actually equal to {1,2,3}, i.e. "repeating elements" does not enlarge a set.

Edit: ...as HoI said already.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K