Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A high schooler looking for some complicated physics problems

  1. Mar 11, 2010 #1
    I'm in high school and am very frustrated by how easy "physics" is. I really enjoy the subject but feel it's watered down in my school, and apparently my state.

    I would like to do some more complicated problems that only cover intro to physics, but are very complicated in that you need to actually think.

    I'm bored with physics in my school. My calculus is not good enough yet to do complicated calculus, so I can't do that.

    I want to challenge myself.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 11, 2010 #2
    If [tex]x=2sin(9t)[/tex] expresses a mass on a spring in simple harmonic motion, what is its maximum velocity?

    Not exactly difficult, but it requires some thought.
     
  4. Mar 11, 2010 #3
    Are there any books with physics thought problems?

    I need problems that challenge my logic, not my ability to plug and chug. Your problem is good.

    I hear about SHCAUM's 3,000 Physics problems, but I don't wanna waste money on something that isn't very challenging.
     
  5. Mar 11, 2010 #4

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    Insights Author

    have you checked out Jearl Walker's "Flying Circus of Physics"?
     
  6. Mar 11, 2010 #5
    Here is an interesting problem.

    Consider a point A in space at x1, y1, and another lower point B at x2, y2 (not directly below the upper point). A bead slides on a stiff frictionless wire between the two points. Find the shape (curve) of the wire such that the transit time from a bead released at point A to point B is a minimum. Note: The shortest distance (direct line) is not the quickest. If you want specific numbers; use y1-y2 = 1 meter, and x2 - x1 = 1 meter.

    Bob S
     
  7. Mar 12, 2010 #6
    Try this

    [​IMG]

    The bicycle is on a rough surface and is being gently supported so that it doesn't fall over sideways. It is a standard pedal bicycle.
    You tie a string to the pedal as shown and pull horizontally.
    In which direction does the cycle move?
     
  8. Mar 12, 2010 #7
    Go to Amazon and search “Schaum’s Physics” and have your folks buy you a book. I have the “3000 Solved Problems..” and find it invaluable. They work from simple to hard in each category and solutions to all problems are given so you can learn if you get stumped. (Note – you need to cover the solutions as you work through the problems.)

    The only thing I don’t like about the book is the problems assume you’ve mastered what’s come before. I like to skip around, so that’s kind of a pain, but you’ll probably be sticking to the first chapters so you should be ok.

    Good luck!

    -David
     
  9. Mar 13, 2010 #8
    Try this. You have a wheel of radius (r) with a mark on the rim that is in contact with another mark on the road. The wheel is rolled forward by less than half a turn (theta degrees) so that the distance the base of the wheel moves along the road is x= 2*Pi*r*(theta/360). What is the vertical and horizontal distance that the mark on the rim of the wheel moves by?

    Warning. Despite its simple appearance this is a very difficult problem.
     
  10. Mar 13, 2010 #9
    Go to a bookstore and thumb through it. If you can knock out all 3,000 problems "plugging and chugging" you're ready to start your masters thesis in physics!

    -David
     
  11. Mar 13, 2010 #10
    Are they all 3000 problems a good difficulty or do I have to weed out the easy ones to get to the hard ones?
     
  12. Mar 14, 2010 #11
    your in a room with 2 iron bars , one is a magnet and the other is not ,
    how do u tell which one is the magnet , you can only use the two iron bars to tell which one is the magnet.

    another one , i light 2 candles one candle on each end of the merry go round then i put a glass chimney around the candles to protect the flame from getting blown out when it goes around . but they are still open to the top
    and i spin the merry go round , which way do they candle flames lean , or do they lean at all .
    do they lean out , lean in , fall behind , angle back at a diagonal . lean forward .
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2010
  13. Mar 14, 2010 #12
    The vertical distance is r-rcos(theta) and the horizontal distance is
    2*pi*r(theta/360) - rsin(theta)
     
  14. Mar 14, 2010 #13
    Could you provide the answer to that? According to my calculation, the shortest distance is the quickest
     
  15. Mar 14, 2010 #14

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Nah, I'm pretty sure the quickest is somewhere below the straight line. You want to gain speed first, so initially you go down with higher slope.

    But I'm to lazy to [STRIKE]google it[/STRIKE] derive it. ;)
     
  16. Mar 14, 2010 #15
  17. Mar 14, 2010 #16

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Consider concrete block lying on the surface, mass m, friction coefficient f. What is the minimum force required to pull it from the place. Assume Earth surface (that is, g).
     
  18. Mar 14, 2010 #17
    I got it at 35.26° to the vertical
     
  19. Mar 14, 2010 #18

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    Insights Author

    Bob S didn't explicitly say this, but there's gravity present.
     
  20. Mar 14, 2010 #19

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Google brachistochrone.
     
  21. Mar 14, 2010 #20
    Good for Borek. This deceivingly simple classical mechanics problem is actually a very challenging one. It is not a "plug and chug" problem. The straight-line transit time (y=1-x) is t=sqrt(4/g), but y=(1-x)2.5 is shorter. But is it the shortest? What about
    y=1-sin(pi*x/2)?
    Isaac Newton was challenged to solve this minimum-transit-time problem ~1697, and rumor has it that in one day he found a unique solution (inverted cycloid) which he proved was the shortest transit-time solution, using calculus of variations. Newton "invented" calculus of variations.

    Fermat's Law of minimum transit time in optics is eerily similar to this one. Is there a connection?

    Bob S
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: A high schooler looking for some complicated physics problems
Loading...